Claiming that the Men’s World Cup numbers are “slipping” relative to the WWC is preposterous. The growth rate of the Men’s is slower than the women’s, because all of 600,000 people watched the 2011 WWC and a whopping million watched the 2015 WWC. Contrast that with the ~22 million viewers watching the 2014 Cup.

Women’s…

A co-worker of mine was asking me all about women’s football during the WWC and was surprised when I professed my absolute ignorance. “Don’t you love soccer?” “Well, yeah, but you love baseball and I don’t see you following NCAA softball either.” The fact is I only have a few hours a week I’m willing to devote to…

“It’s understandable, if not just, that the Women’s National Team made far less money than the USMNT from their respective World Cups (although, the men’s World Cup’s superior TV numbers are slipping domestically).”

Because by and large women’s sports are not fun to watch, much the same way that peewee football is not fun to watch. Why would people be as excited to watch far inferior overall athletes play much worse competition in a less skilled, slower fashion, in an already confusing game to many Americans?

This is what my post above is all about. Statistically speaking, there is less chance of being involved any violent crime today, as there was in the 1960’s, but because there is 24 hour news coverage of just about EVERY unfortunate/crazy situation, it looks like the nation is an f’d up place to live.

That said, gun control (or the lackthereof) is a problem that needs fixing.

Exactly.

Oh my GOD vagina dentata DOES exist!

I’d be very interested to hear how exactly you would go about ensuring that she “should not be allowed to write,” Adolf.

I am confused. Maybe someone who practices the law can help me. Lee Daniels says something Sean Penn feels like defames him, Sean Penn sues him, and then Lee Daniels uses the First Amendment to say, basically, “Shut your mouth.” Isn’t the first amendment only for use whenever the government tries to silence speech?…

“[Terrence] ain’t done nothing different than Marlon Brando or Sean Penn, and all of a sudden he’s some f—in’ demon,” says Daniels. “That’s a sign of the time, of race, of where we are right now in America.”

Is this an indication of the end of Jezebel’s love affair with Hillary? Because what kind of evidence can you get to disprove an assault that happened in a different decade?

I couldn’t believe that Hillary publicly prescribed to the “Treat every allegation as fact” ideology for this very reason. As soon as she did, this exact question became fair game.

It’s actually the Mary one that really cracks me up.

Reading the comments on this article will be interesting. Quite the conundrum for all the liberal gawker / Jezebel posters regarding whose side to take and or how best to demonstrate that they personally have the most white guilt. I’m going to get my poocorn outfit this one.

Oooohh Gawker and Jezebel get so conflicted when they have to choose to side between black people and white women.

how is he an abuser??? everyone on here has already presumed his guilt. i am genuinely confused. if she hit him first, why is he painted as the abuser, even if he was just trying to defend himself? or are all white women dainty flowers who pose no real threats to men, especially black (read: violent, strong) men? WTF…

Are you sure you want to believe the woman who started the fight?

If this was a 16 year-old girl, Jezebel would rip apart any publication that sexualized her. I see no reason why they should treat a male child any differently.

Ahh yes, Jez’s famous support of sexualizing minors.