It looks like neoprene but it’s actually wool.

Way to insult* and stereotype the Bernie faithful. It may come as a shock to you but not an insignificant number of us are wealthy middle-aged people who can easily afford to purchase such things. Whether we’d want these things in particular is another matter altogether. Personally I’d rather earmark that money for…

That’s sad. Look at your life, look at your choices.

Vetements is fucking crap, Demna is a racist douchebag, and this, Fashion, is your end product after putting high fashion to a popular vote. Fuck Karl, fuck Anna, fuck LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE, fuck Kendull and the stupid Hadids, and most of all fuck Vetements and everyone who fell for Demna’s circus act…

Susan Sarandon’s next boyfriend will be getting such a fun wardrobe!

Their parents can.

Best cliff notes on the subject ever.

Feminism is about giving women the power and opportunity to make their own choices, even if you disagree with said choice.

I think you can be a feminist and anti-abortion, but you can’t be a feminist and be anti-choice. Feminism isn’t about the right to “live out our womenhood.” It’s about working to liberate women from the oppression of the kyriarchy. Feminists don’t have to see abortion as an option for themselves, but attempting to…

Just to be pedantic, that chart you refer to has nothing to do with “net worth” as a concept. Net worth is ASSETS - LIABILITIES. That’s a list of supposed revenue. My net worth isn’t equal to the total of all the money I’ve made. How much do you think she’s spent on lawyers in the past few years?

Wait. So your logic is, if someone tries to commit suicide, it is clear they have learned their lesson, been rehabilitated and should be released? This train of thought gives me a migraine

In defamation cases, the defendant has the benefit of the doubt (that’s in contrast to other countries). The burden is on her to prove she is telling the truth - not on him to prove her a liar. I’m not sure what kind of evidence she has. The other issue is that defamation requires damages - she’d have to show that…

Here is an part of an e-mail Zervos sent l to Rhona Graff, Trump’s assistant in April:

I had never heard this accusation, so I looked her up. This is the original press conference from November. Her moans and then confusion at the end of the press conference remind me of the Vinny “The Chin” Gigante trial where he wore pajamas and acted like he had dementia.

I’m torn. On one hand, I can totally believe every word she says, easily. BUT - this case sounds weak as hell. First, she’s arguing that he made her an “implied job offer.” I struggle to think how that’ll fly. Job offers are pretty much one of those things that should be in writing - or, if they are verbal, have to be…

Does Gloria Allred ever settle these, or win, or anything? I mean, add it up: 2007. Implied Job offer. No actual proof. California, where celebrity court cases go to die. This is gonna get bounced, and anyone in their right mind can see it. Why even START down the road with that little behind it?

I dunno. I do think the perception that the “elite” gangs up on Trump does elevate his support among his supporters—and maybe even persuaded some swing voters.

For me, it’s a tie with whether I’m more scared of China or Trump. Because we can band together to react to China. But probably not once Trump has reduced government to a bunch of underinformed, C-student, self-important, vagina lottery winners who don’t know policy, strategy, logistics or infrastructure.

There’s been a noticeable increase in “pro-life” billboards around my town, and they seriously just read “REAL MEN LOVE BABIES.” I really don’t get the intention but it’s so fitting to me, since the abortion debate seems to just be centered around men and it’s mainly men who get to dictate what I do with my body. So…

“Who in the hell is this Democrat-come-lately to scold Democrats on all they’ve done wrong?”