Can you really? I’ve seen a 777, and with the fuel tanks distributed all over, I can’t really visualize it. I can’t visualize driving 80 times around the Earth either, for that matter. But I can visualize an Olympic pool that’s only 10% filled.

The houses of that period would have been more like caves dug into windblown sediment, according to co-author David Cohen, an archaeologist at National Taiwan University, which collapsed when the earthquake hit, killing the people inside.

a dragon to dig channels and a giant turtle to haul mud

Most people here have driven a car (which seems to average a little under 40 mpg, not great for a diesel car). Not many have fueled a 777. With the Olympics around the corner you could also say it’s about 8% of an Olympic size swimming pool.

This is obviously fake. Official FBI statements always say "we can neither confirm nor deny..."

Half the time I use battery saver (upside down to turn off graphics), the screen stops being responsive and I need to restart Go. Removing feature seems to be Niantic’s preferred solution to a bug, so no surprise.

They should call it a discount if you allow them to “share” your data. There, problem solved. Maybe I should work for marketing.

Flight crew should be equipped with cattle prods to use on people getting their carry-on from overhead bins in these situations.

Further proof that they’re the hottest thing on two wheels.

It is available (and coupon works). Just not with Prime shipping (free shipping, but takes a week or so).

It is available (and coupon works). Just not with Prime shipping (free shipping, but takes a week or so).

Erm, with the coupon code, it’s $12.99. I’m pretty sure that’s cheaper than $15.99 (but with this new economy thing you never know...)

Erm, with the coupon code, it’s $12.99. I’m pretty sure that’s cheaper than $15.99 (but with this new economy thing…

Of course. I wouldn’t come here if it didn’t :)

No, I think we already failed the filter event in July.

Unlike you I’m honest about my tinkering :)

Unlike you I’m honest about my tinkering :)

It’s gotten to the point where if I see it used correctly, it looks wrong. I think it’s only a matter of time before I start making that mistake too :(

I think you mean “anecdotal”, unless your evidence nullifies poison :)

“Losing”. It may be a losing battle too, but I’m Quixotic about this particular one :)

Surprised this hasn’t made an appearance yet.

I’m quite conflicted about this exact issue. Do we vote our conscience, or do we vote against the one we don’t want to win by casting our vote for the only candidate with a chance of winning against that candidate? In the end, depending on the state you’re in, it may not matter at all anyway.

The way I see it, if you don’t vote, it’s your fault whoever gets elected. I do agree that the system is flawed - the two party nomination process as well as electoral votes. I’d love to see 4 way race of Clinton, Sanders, Trump and Cruz. One of these is not like the others...