I don’t think I could handle the “Bullitt” badging on the rear or steering wheel. The lack of rear quarter louvers is also a bummer. Other than that, sure looks and sounds nice!

The numbers don’t lie either. The SS sold less in 4 full model years than the G8 sold from March to December of its first year. Looks and marketing killed the SS

I’ll use this space to plug the goFundMe set up for your family! People, please donate so that we can see this wonderful man once again eating various flavored Oreos (as long as your doctor says it’s cool).

I guarantee that whatever patents, claims, and trademarks, which all the other iterations of Jeep possessed, are currently in the hands of FCA. I was just referring to the fact that although Bantam may have designed the original article, for all legal intents and purposes, FCA owns those rights. They may as well have…

only if you choose to or have friends with questionable taste

yea, I was going to go in that direction. However, although it’s technically correct, the Jeep image is de facto FCA’s

Gotta find some irony in the fact that the vehicle FCA used to illustrate their “trade dress” isn’t even made by them anymore. I think this emphasizes the notion that if they don’t want the Roxor to exist, they should probably just give us what we want

lol if this seems odd to you, check out the license agreement for X-Men and Spiderman movies. It’s quite literally mind blowing. As long as Fox and Sony make one of each every 2 years, they can’t lose the rights...

The take the lowest hanging of the cliché fruit,

The fact that this is not coming out on the Switch is a crime

My father harps about depreciation and then owns all of his vehicles for 10+ years and drives them into the ground. He’s quite literally only sold one car in his life. At that point, why does it matter?

My father harps about depreciation and then owns all of his vehicles for 10+ years and drives them into the ground. He’s quite literally only sold one car in his life. At that point, why does it matter?

Pure cu. ft. numbers don’t always equal out to a feeling of usable space. Not saying either one of you are right, but those hard numbers don’t really tell the true story

Very true. I test drove the Fiesta when shopping for the Fit and couldn’t believe how tight that rear seat is. Plus, the first two generations of the Fit drive and shift pretty well!

Same kind of goes for my Honda Fit. Most people are surprised by how roomy it is on the inside. Gotta love well designed hatches

Last time I checked the story has continuously evolved. They had been saying 5,000 by Q3 gets Tesla profitable. This was then altered to 6,000 for profitability. Now, this article is saying the goal is 7,000. Tesla is anything but consistent, and this is nothing new.

Telsa will be profitable when they make 5,000 Model 3s per week

[exhaust note] that’s satisfying without bordering on obnoxious like a Jaguar F-Type

And neither are the limits of hybrids, plug-in hybrids and EVs; all of which bump up an automaker’s CAFE rating

Not all routes are > 300 miles. There’s plenty of destinations from the ports of LA, Seattle, New Jersey, etc that are within the range of such a vehicle