thegreatmango
TheGreatMango
thegreatmango

Poorly thought off selfish comments? Like the ones your BFF made after he was held accountable for reddit level doxxing off a man who works for your competitor? Ya it’s not his fault that he approved an article that’s sole purpose was to shame a man for having the “audacity” to want to have sex with a man. An article

I read it. I’m sure Tommy Craggs is nice to his friends and kind to animals. But that doesn’t excuse the egregious (and that’s too mild a word) ethical travesty that transpired, that Craggs is partially responsible for, and that no one on the Gawker Media editorial staff seems to want to acknowledge. There have been

Yea this is super typical for this contributor.. I've learned to start bracing myself for her general lack of human decency & super judgemental stance across the board. Also, she is like the only mom writer on here giving a super well rounded voice to the women who are moms on this platform............

I’m a little confused about where this piece came from. Tracy is making assumptions about this guys character whilst assassinating him without consequence. I get shes super angry about the other side of it but I feel like there’s more going on in her life than just this article and it’s kind of awkward to read. It’s

Your assumption that all men are sociopaths who only behave decently as a manipulation for sex is disgustingly misandrist. How dare you be so hateful to men. They are human beings, fully capable of being people of decency and integrity.

Gosh, holy cow, I agree. You make this into a huge rant about other people’s problems when he just wants some advice. Holy shit.

but it is also reality that things are always worse for a black woman. So no white women have valid feelings or concerns.... but also its far worse to be a black disabled women so no able bodied black women have any valid feelings or concerns.... or maybe things aren't so "black and white" and all people have varying

Okay Tony.

It seems like the less-remarkable and less-public they are, the more ripe they are for commentary.

Oh my god, that’s exactly how I felt. Why so much hate in this post?

Jesus, thank you for being the first comment I read. What a needlessly ugly piece. Apparently, just throw in the word “entitled” and you are free to express all the petty and nasty thoughts in your head. Christ, what an asshole.

Thanks for saying that.

And the level of immaturity going on in the Gawker posts by their own writers is beyond idiotic. It’s embarrassing. They’re humiliating themselves and making themselves look like utter fools at this point. But hey, this is nothing new; my second banning here was for something I said on Gawker that a writer here didn’t

If they started removing all the stars of rapist celebrities, the sidewalk would not be ADA compliant.

Especially when they didn’t even mention their own hit shows. OITNB and House of Cards are pretty appealing because they are well made

Good job posting this right after the Poldark post:

What you’re not understanding is that she made a statement that was incorrect. I’m not criticizing her focus on blacks—she’s speaking through her experience. What I have an issue with is that she not paint the picture more bleak than it needs to be. Everyone gets criticized for having plastic surgery.

No, but the facts asserted have to be correct. All women are criticized for altering their bodies: Nicki Minaj, Heidi Montag, Farah Whatever her last name is—all women. Feminism, to me, should be intersectional. All boats should rise.

Actually no. Humanism is believing that humans can sort their shit out without the rules of a deity. It’s a form of atheism that believes rationality and empirical evidence are all we need to be better people. Egalitarianism is “I personally think everyone should be equal and that’s good enough for me.”

Also it wasn’t the “shock of her life.” It barely elicited an eyebrow raise.