I beg to differ - my daughter just turned 9 and manages to write with eloquence far beyond this cretin.

I think this is his second attempt - first draft was probably something like this:

...could be “flesh-monger” (Measure for Measure)

Step right up , step right up! The 21st century version of the classic victorian freak show is here, for your grotesque voyeurism delight

I’m rather tired of those who weild the argument “but aren’t most of them brats?” as a defence of reprehensible teenagers. I teach 14 year olds and most are respectful, thoughtful, fluent, politically engaged young adults.

“she’s true to her brand”

I’ll be there, with bells on.

Me too.

I wouldn’t be too sure.

To be fair, she did marry into a 950 year old monarchy of inbred nutters, gentry fluffers and walking corpses that should have been laughed off the world stage many years ago - so in that sense, no outfit could possibly be considered “too old”

“We have consistently demonstrated that the Company is committed to a diverse workplace”

What a bizarre argument* ! Monuments/statues are about commemoration, an officially endorsed sign of respect designed to honour the memory of a person/historical event: they are not a reminder of “what not to do again”.

He’s not very good. It sounded like a drunk person attempting to play ‘Mary Had a Little Lamb’.

Yeah, I think it’s misguided to pay so much attention to this tinpot regime, because all it does is ramp up the jingoism of Trump supporters . NK is looking for any excuse to be validated.

I think the Trump hiring process is probably quite a simple one*:

1. This sounds like the first sentence in a really terrible, self-published thriller

I would like to introduce you to my career plan B : inventor of the Smogbox*. As a non-smoker I find it pretty gross when people smoke - do what you like at home, but on the busy street where I can’t escape, in outdoor cafes when I’m just trying to enjoy the sunshine (etc etc), it’s rank. SO, I have invented** the…

Exactly!! That’s why it’s such an illogical/nonsensical form of anti-choice activism, spurned by right wing zealots who have found it is politically expediant to whip up their zombified parishioners with pictures of dead babies and directed them straight to the polling booth.

Because Soros is a philanthropist?

Perhaps because they are generally hypocrites? I mean, the whole practice of believing in a load of plagirised bronze age myths and metaphors and applying it to modern life without evidence or rationale means you are already setting up a pretty rickety ethical framework.