“Charities” like this and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation are…

The goal here is to fuel this absolutely psychotic one-dimensional obsession with tesla

Oh they’re definitely stupid. But they’re also a troll. “Lefties” is a pretty big giveaway.

Why feed the obvious troll? You should’ve just left them in the greys.

The problem with trying to be fair and see things from both sides is that it doesn’t work when one side is already full-on blaming the other side based on pure lies.

I didn’t watch the show. But if the extent of his “bothsidesing” boils down to this: “The host rightly calls out both parties for their inaction on immigration, an unsolvable issue so ingrained in American politics that Republicans won’t even sign the immigration bill [a bill Democrats crafted and which Trump…

you’re just as intolerant as you’re claiming they are, right?

Person one: “ everyone must follow my religion and its rules”

Its pretty refreshing to have logic as your only "belief"/"God". Try it sometime!

Here’s the difference: my beliefs aren’t based on made-up fairy tales. Fuck your religion. Fuck all religion. If you want to believe in fairy tales, fine. But keep it the fuck to yourself. Stop trying to force everyone else to believe in your bullshit.

Fuck your beliefs. Do your fucking job.

A restaurant that aims to be “high-end” wouldn’t offer a burger in the first place.

“So if you have $40 or $50 entrees and you have a $19 burger, and a third of the people get the burger, you’re losing a huge amount of money.”

Seriously, TN politics sees this billing issue as a feature, not a bug. And while declining Part B carries risk, the cost of that risk sure does seem disproportional to the cost, and also wildly unpredictable and surprising. And maybe to this woman $175/month was real money. Of course most of us know the real answer…

I routinely charter Honda Jets and fly coast to coast for $50k.  This charge from the ambulatory company I would classify as predatory.  

Not even in the same ballpark!

While several responses are “they opted out of part B, so live with the consequences of their actions”.... Stop it, this woman is over 65 and probably on a fixed income where they COULDN’T afford it. The sheer fact that there is a $71K difference between insured and uninsured is proof that they are price gouging.…

The larger issue is that vendors charge insurance companies fees that are far less than the fees they charge uninsured consumers - this should be changed and fees should all be the same regardless of insurance coverage - so if the air ambulance company would have accepted 10,000 from insurance they should do the same…

I would agree IF the flight costs were reasonable. $81K for a 79 mile flight is not reasonable. Knowing “air ambulance bills were high” is not the same as getting a $81 K bill, especially when if she had been covered by Medicare the air ambulance company would only have been allowed to charge $10K. That is a $71K…

Gonna drag every one who might have a major, even controlling stake in an auto company, a transportation company, and a space exploration company, all of which are highly relevant to this site?