thefreshness
BumpinFresh
thefreshness

I apologize - I didn't mean to imply that someone touching or grabbing your camera makes it okay to punch them in the face, at all. I thought I was clear on that when I wrote "I am not saying it justifies punching someone in the face, but, I would absolutely consider it to be an assault - especially if my camera is

I was told a long time ago - the only way to guarantee a secret will be kept is to tell nobody. Not your BFF, not your spouse, not your parent - nobody.

People should be able to have private pics. But, if you want the convenience of digital distribution and storage, you are sacrificing some privacy protection. You

They absolutely could make it no photos allowed - but, did they? If photography was barred at the event, why wouldn't she mention that important detail? Why didn't the Student Liaison ask him to stop taking pics? It seems to me that, if this was a "no photos allowed" event, that would have been mentioned.

Okay, let's say that's 100% accurate - what right did she have to grab or touch his camera? I am a photographer - if I am shooting pictures and someone comes up and grabs my camera, I have a real problem with that. I am not saying it justifies punching someone in the face, but, I would absolutely consider it to be

I have only seen one episode of Catfish, and the dude seemed like a dick - I ain't got no love for Schulman.

But, her story, at least what I have read so far, doesn't make sense to me.

I cannot imagine a dude randomly attacking a woman in front of a party full of people at Sarah Lawrence, and getting away with it.

Not trying to defend Schulman in a general sense, but, specific to the photography part - since when do you have to ask people's permission to take pics at a campus event? People take pics at dances, sporting events, concerts, etc. - all the time. I know it's a private college, so it's private property, but, it

I couldn't take it - I turned it off, and I won't be watching the NFL on ESPN this year.

LONE STARRRR!

Mike Wise and Jason Reid of The Washington Post blocked me for using the phrase "circle jerk". Wise said my language was "vile", and clarified via email that he wanted to keep his twitter feed "clean". I pointed out that his employer reviewed multiple albums and concerts by the band The Circle Jerks, and printed

I disagree. If Dungy had been honest, he would have said "I don't want him on my team, because I disapprove of homosexuality". Instead, he tried to hide behind the claim that Sam would be a distraction - an assertion clearly undercut by Dungy's pervious support of Vick.

Smith is skipping over what Dungy actually

Feinstein's piece makes it onto the Mt.Rushmore of the stupidest, most offensive, completely indefensible columns ever printed in The Washington Post Sports section. You got Feinstein on Bias, Sally Jenkins on Paterno, and Mike Wilbon on Sean Taylor. The 4th spot is sorta up for grabs and up for nominations - I am