The Chiron doesn’t use normal tire valves stems... so, who knows, they might weigh that much... I mean, it was designed by Germans, and literally everything on the Chiron is over-engineered.

That’s the number I found on a page about the Chiron... so *shrugs*

You wouldn’t even need to do a test to prove it... it can be done with math.

I know what the OP said... and I answered that. And that’s not what I said... work on that reading comprehension.

I said Bugatti can’t do it safely... they’re not as reckless as Koenigsegg, as in they won’t idiotically drive a car faster than the tires that are on it can safely handle... and that they won’t make an…

What you don’t understand is that if Bugatti wants the top speed record, they want it to be the Guinness World Record for Fastest Production Car... and in order to get that record, the car must be road legal. Custom built tires aren’t road legal. And don’t tell me having the Guinness World Record doesn’t matter... if…

It’s not that it’s impossible... it’s that they’re not willing to risk someone’s life to test their car at a location that is less safe than their own test track. The Ehra-Lessien Test Facility’s high speed track is quite literally the safest place on earth to conduct such high speed testing. It’s literally designed…

Do they explain why it’s impossible for a Bugatti to drive on a lake bed or empty Nevada highway?

Why? Why does it need turns to find out the top speed?

Isn’t it a “cyclone” (like Monster Trucks do) at that point, instead of just a donut? I think so.

I don’t remember where I read it, but I recall reading something saying that the mid engine C8's architecture construction isn’t vastly different from the existing architecture... Aluminum and Fiberglass, with some Carbon Fiber thrown in... if they’re building it that way, I don’t see why it would have to be much more…

Tesla fan tomorrow after this guy’s car runs over a pedestrian: It’s not Tesla’s fault. Clearly this guy was abusing the feature!

Because it’s annoying, and you’re wrong...

According to Ferrari, whom I think gets to make this decision, being as they made and named the car... No, it’s not. It’s just the “Enzo Ferrari” and not the “Ferrari Enzo Ferrari”. Same goes for the “LaFerrari”. It’s not the “Ferrari LaFerrari”, it’s just the “LaFerrari”. The idea, I’d assume, is that since “Ferrari”…

The pre-1976 thing doesn’t make any sense to me... if a state would allow this engine to be put into, say, a 1970 Dodge Charger, then how would it be any different if I were to put it into a 2019 Dodge Charger? I mean, in either car, the engine still produces the same amount of power, still has the same emissions,…

Maybe my brain is failing me due to the fact that I’m tired, but... why can it only be used in pre-1976 cars, exactly?

Have you looked at Wohl’s twitter feed? The dude is getting pummeled in the comments... lol... it’s hilarious. What a fucking moron.

You can find a 2005 Dodge Neon SRT-4 ACR with 24K on the clock in near showroom condition for $400 consistently?

Your co-worker is a moron if he thinks all cheesesteaks are equal... because as anyone who has eaten cheesesteaks from lots of different places will tell you, they most certainly are not equal. The quality and flavor of the cheesesteak can vary quite a bit... some places cook it too long resulting in a drier…

Who says they’d need to build a new game engine? There are game engines on the market which they could negotiate a license for that would be better than the existing one. There’s another game you can play through “Arc” called “Star Conflict” made by Gaijin Entertainment that has a game engine which, if used for STO,…

I agree... STO needs to be rebuilt on a newer game engine... I think one of the reasons why STO has periods where the game gets glitchy AF is because they keep slapping band aids onto the game engine, trying to make it better, and it inevitably causes problems. Though, in my opinion, if CBS decides to do an “STO2"...…