As I just said to another... This info comes from a documentary on Air Force One, which I saw a few years ago, and I do not know the name of the documentary, therefor, I literally can’t provide the source. There was another commentor who has also seen it, but iirc, he couldn’t recall the name of it either.

That info was from a documentary about Air Force One. I’d list the name of the documentary, but it’s been a few years since I’ve seen it, and I have no idea what its name was.

It’s called a hypothetical question. I was not falling back, I was asking a hypothetical. You do know what “hypothetical” means, right?

“Without getting too verbose, there’s no need for a decoy nor would it work as a ruse.”

Internet Boy? Uh, I’m no boy... I haven’t been a boy in over 20 years.

“I present myself as a knowledgable authority, but I’m not going to prove it”

What makes you think the decoy lands where Air Force One does? And even if it does, what purpose would there be to taxiing both planes to the same area in the airport, when there’s only people on one of them? The other is likely taken to a hangar to be refueled, etc, while it waits to resume decoy duties, or assume…

No. It’s not. There are two identical planes which act as Air Force One. Whichever is not acting as Air Force One, acts as the decoy for Air Force One. Both get fighter escorts, and fly similar paths. Both have anti-missile defensive measures, amongst others that are classified, to provide a small amount of defensive…

I can tell you one defensive thing about Air Force One... There’s two of them, and they are identical, and they both fly everywhere the President goes. One carries the President and his staff and gets the designation “Air Force One”, and the other is a decoy, though they do swap roles from time to time. Both get…

OMFG. Seriously? You take shit too seriously... I think you need to smoke a joint, and relax. And for the record, “Men!” is definitely something exclaimed by feminists... I’ve seen it probably at least a dozen times from my feminist friends on FB... How do you not realize this? This is Jezebel, the land of feminist…

I dunno, I think they could have achieved 200 hp with an updated 16/20 valve 4AGE “Black top” that had direct injection... It had 160 some hp as it was, so I imaging with what they’ve learned since then, and with direct injection, I don’t think 200hp is a stretch...

As for people saying it’s underpowered... I suspect…

“Did you even read that article?”

Well, to be fair, Toyota hasn’t really brought out anything new that they could use a boxer engine for... but you could be right about it being a coincidence.

Personally, I wish Toyota would have just done the engine themselves, and done an updated/modernized direct-injection version of the 16 or 20-valve 4A-GE...…

In New Jersey, there are ONLY full service stations... It’s actually illegal for you to pump your own gas in NJ.

The FA20 Motor was designed by both Toyota and Subaru specifically (initially) for the Toyota GT86/Scion FR-S/Subaru BRZ... And yes, from what I recall, the 86mm by 86mm cylinder design was part of their homage to the AE86, as was the 86mm exhaust. Don’t underestimate how legendary the AE86 is in Japan... Especially…

You know, you’re right. They should name it the “Dodge Dart GLH Hellkitten” and have a kitten version of the Hellcat logo.

Here’s an idea... Dodge... Take the 5.7 liter HEMI v8 from the Charger, cut it in half and make it into a 2.8 liter HEMI 4 banger, tune it to make around 250 hp (or Supercharge that bitch up to 325-350 hp and do a mini-hellcat). Now, throw it in the front of that Dodge Dart GLH Concept, with a 6 speed manual…

Well, this is what I had always heard... I suppose I’ll look into it some more.

It hides, not to look flashy, but so dickheads don’t steal the “Spirit of Ecstasy” hood ornament off of your Rolls... hood ornament theft was common on certain brands back in the day.

That’s because the car is in part an homage to the “Hachi roku” the AE86 Toyota Corolla...