It’s pretty simple - it’s Patriachy.

No, the people that reported her are actually just utilizing the system the way it’s supposed to be used given Twitch’s nebulous ToS, the fact that the admins found ground to ban her should be proof of that. To make an example: big companies that evade paying taxes using legal loopholes are at fault for being greedy…

I am too but it’s about the amount of responsability, which isn’t the same, one group impact the streamers’ income and ability to stream directly, the other doesn’t. I’m arguing that the one that does is far more at fault than the other.

The issue is that it’s legit not clear if the outfit she’s wearing is against ToS(so worthy of a ban) because Twitch’s ToS is so goddamn vague that technically even that Chun Li outfit could classify as inappropriate for their platform, so the reports about it, done in bad faith or not, are not actually irrefutably…

I don’t think the first problem is actually a thing, if the report system was so easily gameable by bad faith actors, popular female streamers hated by incels like Alinity or Amouranth would be banned every other week and that’s obviously not what happens.

She was banned 3 days for this, Dr. Disrespect was banned for a month for the bathroom incident so I don’t think your joke works as well as you might think, just saying.

They’re miserable yes, but all they’re allegedly doing is mass reporting, which doesn’t automatically ban the streamer, it’s Twitch that decides whether to ban them or not, so while the incels are vile, the real problem here is once again Twitch with its bipolar banning decisions and vague ToS.

Oh boy, first off:

no personalities? So the fact that they each are the physical embodiment of a negative emotion which transpired through pretty much every line of their dialogue making each one of them unique and instantly recognizable count as having no personality? Well color me surprised.

If you want to reduce Kojima’s competence in writing compelling female characters in mgs4 to a couple of hidden minigames most people didn’t even discover, be my guest I guess. And also since when is sexualization synonymous with bad writing? or is sexualization bad writing only when done to women characters? Because…

MSG3 was his best attempt at it yes, but what exactly was wrong about it in mgs4? that game had the biggest female cast in any mgs, and creepy hidden/optional minigames aside, they were all extremely well realized. Hell I would argue that the women were the most important chartecters aside from snake and liquid, Meryl…

absolutely fucking not but a lengthy investigation is better than basically no investigation at all. Having more information is ALWAYS better.

I am at a complete loss as to why you thought point 1 2 and especially 3 needed to be reiterated but ok I guess, I don’t disagree with any of those points(even tho regarding point 1 they did straight up told us they didn’t know but alright, I’m not going repeat this point again since this is the third time I do so in…

Also about the part where they say they corroborated the allegations after they learned about them. Like I said multiple times now the devs learned about this stuff extremely recently, there is no way in hell they were able to conclusively corroborate all these allegations in a matter of days, these types of…

because they didn’t know about the abuse, they knew Alec was unstable and had bad relationships but nowhere near to this degree, here’s a direct quote of them literally saying they had no idea how bad it was: “The things that Alec did during the bad times were worse than we knew, and he’s still being abusive in other…

I still don’t understand what the hell I missed, all it says in your quote is exactly what I said, that the abusing behaviour was something they only truly learned this week through people finally coming forward. And since we are in the business of quoting stuff, here’s the section literally right after what you…

The fact that they were clear doesn’t mean that I have to agree with their reasoning or methodology, they learned about the abuse this week, good, start a proper investigation to see how much truth there is to the allegations and then after careful consideration make a decision and then you go public with it. Asking…

In my comment I said that they knew from past experiences that he was unstable, but they also said that they didn’t know about the actual abuse that was going on and that they learned about it basically this week, the same week they made the statement to cut ties with him, please tell me what part of what I just wrote…

I’ve read the reddit post with the devs statement about the situation but I still think they made the wrong choice by publicly cutting ties with Alec so soon after the allegations came out, yes they say there was already history of Alec being unstable but by their own admission they didn’t know about how abusive he…

call me when they do this with Thomas the Tank Engine