I thought she was great, what didn't you like about her responses to Zero Dark Thirty critics?
thedogsbollocks
thedogsbollocks
I have no idea where you've lived but I regularly see cops on foot, you can find them in just about every urban center, and they don't look like they're about to take Fallujah.
Since when did SWAT teams start making regular foot patrols?
Indeed, but those aren't the initial moves, combined with a public interview on CNN, which would indicate Sterling is intending to roll over and not fight the NBA on this.
I don't think it's nearly that much of a foregone conclusion; remember Sterling has refused to pay the $2.5 million fine and has retained Maxwell Blecher.
Those are all arguments which would be made in court, not publicly in the press. Furthermore, let's say, hypothetically, Donald Sterling could produce a litany of correspondence/communications with other NBA franchise owners (over the past 30+ years) that contained inflammatory racist language which he could prove…
Because such a case concerns a contractual obligation to binding arbitration, it's much more complex than a criminal trial. Admissibility isn't directly at issue. But the defense could argue contractual breach on behalf of the NBA in that their decision was based on an illegal recording.
Haha, indeed. I think my general strategy would be, assuming my financial resources could manage it, to always carry a golf club with me; any time the paparazzi showed up, I'd target they very most expensive piece of video equipment in the general vicinity and swing for the fences.
You mean after the NBA rendered their judgement?
1. Entirely possible.
The USA's or the NBA's?
1. Don't know if it's being investigated by law enforcement, but California is a "two party consent" state; there are criminal and civil penalties for violating the statute.
I think the NBA might've shot itself in the dick (at least ethically, possibly also legally) when they did nothing in regards to his sworn testimony in the 2003 housing discrimination cases, but decided to act when a private conversation, recorded (possibly) illegally was posted to a tabloid site.
Don't underestimate California courts.
there is not reason to buy Beats. it is not a threat and never will be.
Ok, why?
I predict a surge in canned tuna demand across the US for the next week. As an insurance policy of sorts.
I've seen this happen, and every time I think it's the equivalent of the cat saying, "You may be larger and stronger than me, but I'm quicker, sharper, and nastier. You may get me in a rush, but not before I've made it a highly regrettable experience for you. Prepare to say goodbye to your eyes."
A bad place? You don't read quarterly financial statements, do you?