I’m not one to clutch pearls, but this joke seems to be in incredibly poor taste to me. Especially since the victims of such abuse are often the only ones wondering “why now?” when it’s clear the guy is a piece of shit and needs no reason.
I’m not one to clutch pearls, but this joke seems to be in incredibly poor taste to me. Especially since the victims of such abuse are often the only ones wondering “why now?” when it’s clear the guy is a piece of shit and needs no reason.
Or maybe there’s more than one way to PowerPoint?
“Billboard estimated “Reputation” has already sold more than $240 million worth of tickets, making it the highest-grossing tour of the star’s career, and is on track to crack $300 million in total sales.”
What filters you using? I’m not seeing what you apparently are.
Very possible, to something tells me we are only months away from Blog articles about “Louis Surprises Comedy Cellar audience with surprise appearance” type articles marking “the beginning” of all this.
Having no idea what a real “burpee” is, good on her for going by the rules of the competition and crushing it.
Armchair fashionistas up in here
A lot of top comments are dismissing IW as having “no stakes”.
Jesus how many neckbeards inhabit these boards?
Yeah, metacritic is a solid resource here.
77 for his last album on the site. Way beyond good for the genre/site.
77 for his last album is a pretty great grade for recent hip hop on that site.
As the very brief article manages to cover... yes...
Guys, do NoT let this sucker you into signing up for YouTube Red. They have laughably little content and are hoping to sucker some nostalgia lovingly 80's-90's kid’s into signing up and forgetting.
Is the joke that he’s now working at a 7-11? In between television appearances? Your logic is lacking here.
Maybe he he makes her laugh and she likes him as a person? The money and charisma probably doesn’t hurt. Or the looks. He’s doing just fine.
So you think the feminist director who suffers with these same issues is including them solely for sexual fetishization, and not, as the entire article clarifies, to bring difficult and unexplored subject matters to light in an area they have previously been pushed to the side ?
Ignorance is bliss
... no?
You think the feminist director who has struggled with fat shaming/these same issues is trying to fetishize them? Again, context matters. Just because something is in a movie doesn’t mean the director approves, it all comes down to how the subject is treated. That’s why films are made about sad/difficult subjects.