When people respond to other people who bring up a subject, by giving their take on that subject, we call that ‘conversation’. When someone is having a conversation with someone, the subject sometimes changes from one thing, to another. When someone tries to derail a conversation which naturally moves in this way, by…

Excellent jalop reference.  Have a star!

Don’t forget Rob.  He’s always a good read.  And you have to give the young ones time.  It takes a certain amount of twisted growth to get a bansai tree.

The thing is, most vehicles fall apart in predictable ways, which telegraph that they are about to do so, long before they actually do it. Those of us who have lived our early lives in hoopties such as this, develop a sixth sense about it.

Jezebel used to be a cadre of thoughtful and incredibly humorous writers interpreting the days events for their fellow harlots.

There’s a reason people call ‘em pigs.

After getting tased and cuffed because he laughed.

He probably had a dirt bike as a kid and forgot he isn’t very good at it.

You are wrong.

It’s not hate.  Rich people can easily hire trolls. So they do.

They don’t have to wait for whatever timetable Barr insists on, but they DO have to accommodate the redaction process, because of Executive Privilege arguments. After that, they can look at the redacted document, and pull out selected areas that bear scrutiny, and have all this hit right about election time.

They are nothing, if not predictable.

It’s all easy to understand, once you accept the fact that a lack of measurable intelligence is a prerequisite for nomination to any position of authority within the Trump administration.

Imma call him ‘Dick’ for short. Because, well....

Check out Cool Beans Dude above. It’s not even a quality troll either. Sad.

It’s 100% certain that you are full of shit.

“Works with doctors.”  =  “Walks by doctors in the hall on the way to medical records.”

Clearly someone who has no experience with real doctors.

If you read the ‘D-Triple-C’ quote carefully, it says, ‘democratic candidates’, not ‘democratic incumbents’. You only get to be a candidate for an elected office AFTER the primary. So your assessment above is factually incorrect.

Technically, it’s antidemocratic to seek to suppress a primary challenge.