the-thunderwagon
Dr. Pirateface
the-thunderwagon

Well. Fucking. Said.

Lotus and Aston (or was it Jag...?) also love gluing aluminum together, and Lotus in particular has been doing it for a while indeed. If it's good enough for Chapman...

This argument is unassailable.

...or perhaps an engine.

You can be as skilled and proficient and confident as you would like; I'm sorry to say your behavior was reckless and your ex had the appropriate reaction. No driver should ever willingly put themselves - or more importantly, others - in a patently unsafe situation, regardless of whether they can deal with it. Better

BMW Toyota

There is only one correct answer.

Beautiful car, but on an unrelated note... it is becoming increasingly apparent to me that all classic Italian cars have names cobbled together from one or more of the following

Front-mid mounting does carry some benefits with regard to handling dynamics in that you're not hanging the weight of the engine out in front of the front wheels, thereby significantly improving the weight balance and reducing the tendency to understeer. Rear-mid mounting is significantly better for overall agility,

And then it should say "Hello, Michael" and start the engine and immediately begin Turbo-Boosting.

Easy answer. Between the 918 Spyder and the 919 LMP1 racer, Porsche sold me on Hybridization for performance cars. Allow me to explain.

Fuck you, Honda. Fuck you for making awesome, hoonable cars that I wouldn't be caught dead in. Your unending lust for space-efficient cab-forward designs and continuing (though admittedly not unique) pursuit of higher and higher beltlines has turned all your taught, compact funbox coupes and hatchbacks into bloated

As a mechanical engineer who derives an alarming amount of satisfaction from explaining things - especially car things - to people, this post is like crack to me. I WANT TO ANSWER ALL OF THESE QUESTIONS. GAH.