Because it’s an unfair strawman.

I didn’t say there weren’t any reactionary fans, I said most fans who dislike the movie had more reasonable complaints.

With the release of Star Wars: The Last Jedi, entitled “fans” have spent months now whining about any number of grievances, nearly all of which boil down to “Girls! Yuck!”

The constant Trump coverage is irritating but I at least understand it. Giving attention to some random sexist asshole online is just pointless.

I have a idea: Maybe this site could spend more time taking an insightful look at pop culture.

Is the snide, dismissive tone of this writeup really necessary?

Because the solution to an unqualified billionaire President is a different unqualified billionaire President.

Um, was this supposed to be posted this early?

I don’t think getting a tattoo of a politician’s face is “kick-ass” so much as just weird. I mean, that’s something Roger Stone has done.

So, basically, this:

I just wish they’d license better content. A lot of it feels like filler.

What the hell are regionals?

Without control of the studio that provides most of its content, the assumption is that Fox will instead focus more on “sports programming, news magazines, and possibly reality shows” to fill its primetime lineup.

In fairness, I’m not sure Sonia was as into her as Todd was.

“How Will Lena Dunham Disappoint Us This Time”

December 29th.

It’s science fiction, although some episodes might be more accurately labeled speculative fiction, if you want to get technical.

Hannah John-Kamen has been in two episodes.

It doesn’t matter if it’s a joke, it’s not based in any kind of fact. It’s just a snide, intellectually dishonest swipe.

Assuming, of course, that Sanders doesn’t lose and his supporters decide to pout and let Donald Trump win the category somehow, but that probably won’t happen again.