The problem is in a basic storytelling principle that’s often referred to as “Chekhov’s Gun.” The basic idea is every scene, every prop, every comment should have a purpose in the narrative or symbolism. If it doesn’t, it’s a waste of time and a distraction and should not be in the film.

That “ad campaign” by the theater industry (or whoever is selling it) just makes me angry. You want me to come to see your movie in a theater? Don’t make me pay $15 for a non-matinee ticket and then another $15 for an undersized bag of popcorn.

“Literally unwatchable, 7/10" -Kotaku

I had assumed it would be that the dad died long ago and he’s the imaginary friend.

So, you haven’t seen the movie, but you’re saying his review is incorrect.

I see Dea...Unreal...people.

My guess is that Bea is her father’s IF.

I’m going to guess that Ryan Reynolds himself is an IF.  That’s the twist.  

May be tough to prove if it can’t haul a bed full of marijuana leaves.

Yeah, and tied with the oh-so-coincidental fact that he’s a business owner, color me suspicious.

The “Anti-Tesla “articles” on Jalopnik” are automotive journalism, perhaps you should go to Tesla Fanboy sites...

Are you being disingenuous, making a very very very poor attempt at being funny, or are you just genuinely this dense?

Correction: showing up on set several hours late.

“There’s an immediate kinship of like, ‘OK, hey, I see you.’”

Yeah, it struck me as just quickly dispelling rumors rather than anything else. 

Your brain —not just yours— is an incredibly confused, tangled mess of electrical cords. It’s pretty neat, for instance, that if you wear goggles designed to flip your vision upside down, after a few days it goes “Wait, I thought I already flipped a while ago” and flips back again to make it ‘right side up’ again.…

I think I’d have a problem if it was a larger part of the article, but it’s a sentence, the gist of which is “this does not seem to be the case”. That just struck as aware writing.

Seems like an intense actor-y thing where the experience of pretending to be in a post-apocalyptic wasteland fighting for survival was immersive enough that it was messing with her head and mood.

Is it because the lead actress of a film is speaking the language of trauma, and we’ve spent the last ten years reading about abusive directors going after their actresses? Maybe it’s just me, but I’m glad these two sentences were put in, because I know my mind went to harassment.

Right because otherwise all graduation events are 100% legally binding and if you miss them you have to do college again.