Yep. People often seem to forget this.

Hey, quit picking on the 71-73 mustangs. They were only slightly larger than their predecessor, and not much heavier either. Poor cars get a bad rap all the time for their big look, although the specs aren't as exaggerated as people make it seem. Also, they were very well-engineered, much more so than any previous…

a=

You hit the nail on the head. I see nothing wrong with a fully optioned truck. Sometimes you need to get work done but enjoy a rather luxurious interior. I see nothing wrong with manufacturers providing this to their customers, as long as they offer a bare-bones work truck for those of us that want a hauler for cheap.…

I LOVE STEELIES!!! -tears up- Sorry, I'm getting emotional... I love steelies, ummm.. I love every kind of steelie...

Seriously, this excessive use of carbon fiber on everything gets to me. It's become trendy. Astons are about the quality and craftsmanship of their cars, not all this techie racing bullshit. Sure the carbon fiber is light and all the rage now, but I'd rather know I have handformed panels made the way Aston has made…

I would definitely drive something twice my age. In fact, I'd daily drive anything that's got four wheels and a roof (for rainy days). The older the better. For some reason I love to drive cars that are a pain in the ass to drive daily. It just makes me feel more involved and like I'm part of the machine. I'm…

Pardon my French sir, but what the FUCK are you doing sitting on your ass with a degree in Modern Literature when you crank out ideas and drawings like these? I don't mean to sound all fatherly, but your ass needs to go to design school pronto. Time's a-wastin!

Thank goodness for the GT-R driver, 'cause that car is one ugly sumbitch.

Hmm.. you haven't seen any Aston Martins at the track. Therefore, that must mean they can't be driven at one. Interesting. And a GT-R is a better performing machine, but like I said... the Aston Martin is way classier, more luxurious, and dead sexy. GT-R? None of the above.

Great, now I'll think of a Camaro whenever I see the spoiler. Thanks. Thanks a lot.

GT-R huh? Sure, you go ahead and buy the ugly, robotic, not-going-to-age-well, computerized "Godzilla" from Nissan, since you're probably more impressed by numbers than actual charisma on a car. It doesn't have the sex appeal, the looks, or the character this car has.

Yes to this. Maybe it's the association to James Bond or its British roots, but whenever I see someone driving an Aston, I just think to myself, "That's one classy motherfucker right there". Versus my thoughts of douchbaginess when I see a late model Lambo or Ferrari. Not that they would care what anyone thinks, but…

I personally don't think the spoiler is THAT bad. At least it's not as ugly as the XFR-S spoiler. With that said, I agree, a ducktail would've been a much better option. Plus the car is so sexy they had to make it ugly somewhere, otherwise it would've been unfair to the competition.

I've been in both and I absolutely despise sitting in the Camaro. That, plus the extra heft, and the cartoon look that will not age well, and there is just no arguing that the Mustang is a better choice.

Couldn't agree more. I know from experience. I have a '92 Ranger with a 2.3 and manual that I bought about 4 years ago. I got the truck for $500, beat up in almost every imaginable way, and was running on only 2 cylinders at the time, with a failing tranny. Drove it that way for more than a year before fixing those…

Agreed! And I also think Anthony Kiedis looks like Ben Stiller.

Nope, I'd take the convertible. I'm in the minority here, but here's my rationale: If i buy a Jag, it's not going to be a dedicated track car where I need every ounce of chassis rigidity i can get. So that's that. Second, although the lines of the coupe are slightly more graceful, I'd give them up to have a droptop. I…

Maybe its genetic lol.