I don’t give a fuck how long you been up. I don’t give a fuck how long you been staring at a screen or chasin muhfukahs down and shooting people in the back. There is literally no, none, zero, zip, nada excuses that you don’t know where the fuck you live.

That’s bad reasoning. Instead of letting it go to a possible appeal she’s just going to let them pull that shit now? Hah.

Ummm, all states have the felony-murder rule. If you’re in the process of a felony (illegally entering someones home) and someone gets killed, that is first degree murder based on the felony murder rule.

No, but unfortunately they now have to consider a law which most people don’t understand even when given the definition. To most people Castle = SYG in terms of justification. For Black folks, Castle is SYG in its intent of murder without consequences.

Only if you’re white. That does not apply to anyone one else.

Only works if you’re white. A (wo)man’s castle is wherever white feet are planted. It’s like Manifest Destiny.  

How did that work our for Mr. Jean? You know the man who was shot by the bitch who broke into his “castle?”

“In what will appear to many as a bizarre reconfiguration of the law, Judge Kemp ruled that jurors can consider the (castle) Doctrine in their deliberation”

goddamn they will fucking do ANYTHING to not convict a cop for murdering a black dude

It’s not Stand His Ground ffs. This is a fucking miscarriage of justice.

WHAT the Holy FUCKING HELL? In goddamn Texas anyone else’s fucking home can be considered your castle if you’ve fucked up and think its your own??

...You have got to be kidding. That is the biggest load of horseshit I’ve seen in this case. And a black, female judge allowing it? Is she not aware of how the world works or something? I think that headache I’m having just turned into a tumor.

And I’m sure the cops and courts would certainly agree that the castle doctrine could be used if Jean had walked into Guygers apartment and shot her dead...

An armed woman illegally enters a neighbor’s home, unannounced and uninvited. Upon entering, the unarmed resident of the home stands and asks this intruder what the intruder is doing there. The intruder then, apparently fearing for her life, draws her gun and with no warning, shoots (to kill! Her admission!!) and…

I was blown away when the judge read that shit off. Then the lesser charge bullshit. I just dont know about this now. This trial seem shady as fuck right now. The judge gave her team an out and/or a possible lesser charge? 

Based on caselaw, if you want to snuff someone just be sure to gun em down in their house and claim whoops I thought it was mine. You were distracted by texts and hadn’t slept for a day bc of work.

Or? We could just fucking let them? Would it be that much of a loss?

JFC. No.

It’s not the judges fault a law created by racists to kill minorities could in fact be used in deliberation of a blatantly racist attack. That was the whole purpose of creating the Castle Doctrine. That woman’s hands are tied she can only hope there aren’t as many racists on the jury who will say, “Hey, ya know what? I…

So basically in Texas you can go into someone’s home and murder them, but as long as you can claim to be credibly confused, you can get away with it?