O hell no, I’ve never been published. I’m simply talking about in a school setting or a couple times at work to be silly. I’ve never pursued a career or even a dalliance in writing because I don’t really enjoy it.

The Barry comparison is simply that. An observance that satire and humor are often lost on the masses. A…

I receive(d) this accusation a couple of times. I write in a very similar manner to Dave Barry. No matter if it’s a research paper or persuasive I will always pepper in satire and humor. Mainly out of boredom because I hate writing. Many a time a professor would call my writing “too familiar.”
One time I even had to…

Is this really surprising though? 80% of IGN’s articles are just reposting Kotakus/Other Sites articles with some brief commentary. The other 20% is paid ads for EA and Activision disguised as “first exclusive looks.”

I agree with that. They’re much better suited to tablet sized screens.

If you have a smartphone then you have unlimited free Picross games......

I knew this whole blog entry would be a dig on Speedy. Was not disappointed with that assessment. 

Hollow Knight’s main theme is the joy of exploration. Having that one area you can’t map, (but can complete the main mask boss there pretty quickly.) is just part of the joy of it.

Hell yes. And when you hear that glorious Da Da Da of the mapper! Oh it is stupendous!!

Both Dark Clouds had weird Fish Weapons.  I really wish they made more of that series.  2 was incredible. 

I wasn’t kidding. Lol. I just couldn’t entirely remember the name so I guessed as close as I could,

Is the guy who f-ed up Xbox still leading over at Zynga?  Don Mattingly or something is his name.

Okami comes to mind

That would be an incorrect way of putting it too.
I’m also seeing that pro-life is framing it wrong because it’s kind of implying the other side is pro death.
(I’m glad you saw this. Everyone else is so focused on defending “pro choice” they don’t even realize I’m saying both sides are being silly)

So again, just call…

They do exist on the same plane. The argument is if it’s a life or not. That’s it. Everything else you just said is what I’m claiming is obfuscating the issue.

See there you go. You see through it. My pro choice argument is obfuscating what it’s about. The choice the argument is centered around. That’s it. The argument is about abortion.

Hypothetical then.  Should a woman have the option to have her tubes tied under your healthcare plan?  Thereby putting the ball in her court?

That’s the argument. My reasoning is explained a bit further in a comment I start with Pro-police somewhere above.
I could also say:
I’m pro choice, I believe in these choices
Adoption
Birth
Abstinence
Birth Control
I do not agree with abortion as a choice.
Pro/Anti Abortion just cuts right through the BS.

Abstinence does count as an option. If you don’t want to have to worry about the possibility of pregnancy you either don’t have sex or you..... well don’t have the kind of sex where it’s biologically possible.  That is a valid thing to teach as an option.

I’ll put it this way. Pro-police doesn’t mean I want more police. Nor does it mean I advocate for police necessarily. It means I’ll defend them as a good option to dealing with an issue.

You’re either for or against abortion. That’s the only thing in question. It’s either a life or it isn’t. Any other argument is…

Those were both meant to be macguffins to stand in for things not yet possible. The whole argument is purely hypothetical.  Because it has to be as we have no idea what the future holds.  (Notice I never mentioned the video games and focused on technology as a whole.)