Sen. Paul apparently liked to pile his brush trimmings and branches on (or over) the property line into his neighbor’s yard. Apparently this was a long-running dispute between the two. Also, at least one Republican said “it’s easy to understand” why someone would tackle him after Sen. Paul’s recent budget…

Now’s as good a time as any to note that Rand Paul spent years holding himself out as a board-certified doctor, even though was certified by the National Ophthalmology Board an off-and-on board which he created, and not the American Board of Ophthalmologists, whose certification hangs on the wall of damn near every…

“probably has the piss tape in high definition with directors commentary”

The fact that Mueller is making Donald Trump and this collection of scumbags shit in their pants is too good. He has his tax returns and probably has the piss tape in high definition with directors commentary. Trump and his family of grifters made one fatal mistake, they pissed off the intelligence community. These…

I wouldn’t be so quick to dismiss the idea that he was asking them to commit a crime of some sort. I mean how many other people keep walking right into what looks like obstruction of justice?

I think that the lawyers knowing that he intends to commit perjury and being asked to perjure themselves (and thus commit a crime) are equally likely.

If history is any indication, all four of those scenarios are typical Trumpian behaviors.

Do know this (it was something Rachel reminded us the other evening that I’d forgotten):

Agreed. In my context, we petition to withdraw if the client doesn’t pay and we satisfy a few conditions (gave the client notice, our withdrawal doesn’t prejudice them, etc.). But yeah, non-payment, intent to commit perjury, but also, client is just a giant dick, an imbecile, or unhinged nutter who doesn’t understand…

I lean towards the client being deceptive. There are signs that point to them being kept in the dark every time the press uncovers something and asks them to respond. The responses remind me of deer caught in headlights.

“I am not a lawyer, but I would think if three defense attorneys suddenly don’t want to defend a client any longer — especially in a high stakes case such as this — that could be an indication that an anvil is about to drop on someone’s head.”

Would have started a revolutionary new “previously owned and refurbished” art movement with anybody’s art as well

He’s also the guy who parked a functional tank in front of his mansion, so there’s just no accounting for taste.

Came here to say this. An intoxicated woman headlining the morning news for destroying Warhol art owned by a wealthy republican? He’d giggle for months.

He would’ve started sending her to interviews in his stead, unannounced and without explanation

Art in a rich person’s house is lost art in my opinion. I take immense pleasure that a rich person, especially this type of rich person, got some useless and expensive investments destroyed.

Sorry, Trump supporters need to suffer mercilessly.

Can we agree that no Trump supporter deserves to own art?

Yep. Probably would’ve framed the damaged works as new pieces.

It feels like a wash to me. Art kept hidden in a private collection is functionally lost to the public.