You can push policy, subpoena and the states can pursue their cases while the House preps for impeachment.  This is something that pairs very well with each other.

Impeachment starts in the House and she’s a senator. Declaring the 25th amendment relevant to the discussion at hand, the President themselves or the Vice President along with Principle Officers can declare presidential succession. The Principle Officers are 15 members of the cabinet who are all Trump appointees.…

It’s a really great class system though. It transfers to different characters and adds some depth where L4D was shallow.

This isn’t even stooping down. Also, being overseas also didn’t stop her from insulting her own junior congresswomen.

This just isn’t true though. Russia has and is currently taking measures to hack our elections again and the current regime is fighting against reform that would secure it.

You’re pandering to Trumpists who will never vote Democrat. If an impeachment happens for legitimate reasons (which it will) and if the unveiling of a multitude of crimes doesn’t convince a centrist or moderate to see the light, congrats. You’re actually appeasing a Trumpist. You also need to show me where an…

It’s not grandstanding, it’s taking an actual stand and fighting for what is right. Pelosi and the anti-impeachment crowd can create a list of triggers that would lead to an impeachment, but they don’t even want to do that. They are afraid of their own shadow.

Little hope of a second term? A lot of people think he has a really good chance at a re-election.  It is one of the biggest arguments used by the anti-impeachment crowd right now.  

We have very different definitions of a lame duck presidency. Trump has done incredibly bad things that we can’t undo and is putting us and the rest of the world directly on the path to ruin.

Impeachment has always helped the attacking side.

False equivalency.

We got 8 years of Bush if you didn’t notice. Dubya said he would “restore honor and dignity to the White House”. Gore had nothing to do with Clinton’s affair and successful impeachment and get was tied to that whole event. Ignore it, but history says your wrong.

I hope seeing Warren and others jump in Changes Pelosi’s mind.  

Impeachment has always worked out to be a net gain for the attacking party.  Change my mind.

Pelosi shutting down the case for impeachment before the report release is what I have a problem with. It matters because she’s the Speaker with A LOT of power in the House. Your argument is a strawman as I am not arguing against minds changing at a future date. My argument (which is backed by her own words) is…

An aside, if you really want to know what Elizabeth Warren is all about, what her appearances on old episodes of PBS’ Frontline.  She was a go-to for their discussions on the economy.  

I really think it’s between her and Bernie.  If they pick each other to be a running mate should one of them win, I would be on cloud 9.

I can’t help you with your issues with reading comprehension.  

Just sent her money because of this.  I will never understand the fear in Congress Dems to do their duty.  

You answered your own question. It matters because she wanted to discourage her teammates from aggressively pursuing impeachment. Did you see that Pelosi not only refused to comment on impeachment possibilities today, but said that she didn’t want to insult the president while she was abroad?