It is a term from the olden days of 40 odd years ago when it first became acceptable for women to wear pants to the office; most often in the form of matching pants and jacket hence the term pantsuit, before then a woman’s “suit” was automatically a matching skirt and jacket ala Chanel, St. John’s etc. I find it…

... or a very understanding Fotomat

Was more than a little awesome . Haters gonna hate, don’t waste your time.

I have been called same and worse for raising practical on Sanders platform. She would not be my first choice, but from the current crop of D and R she has the best experience and you are correct on all those attributes, she knows the system and can work it. To go back to a tired old refrain the next president will be…

I know right. I love their name calling of people voting for Clinton as “Hillbots”, they don’t realize they sound just like the Republican base.

One wonders if he reads Gawker and will realize how much of a flaming asshole people think he is for making this comment.

Wasn’t Geraldine Ferraro’s son John Zacarro Jr. A bartender there at the time ? Or is that urban legend ?

NYC here, uber not much of a bargain. Don't like their app either.

You must be a young’un. I remember 40 plus years ago when the emissions, safety and mpg regulations went into effect ( tame by today’s standards) and the hue and cry from the car crowd was very much the same. Car & Driver and Motor Trend had articles describing all dealers closed except for those that sold Mazdas with…

Oh don’t be so hard on him, would could possibly go wrong by allowing guns on Amtrak ?

Officer Skippy is adorable but he needs a lab puppy to complete the fanta...err picture

This is why it is important to have a Democrat in the White House and why I am voting for Clinton. The only way we get meaningful laws in place is for SCOTUS to link the right to bear arms to membership in a well regulated militia, and define the term ‘well regulated militia’ to be what the drafters would have…

Both you and ad infinitum’s comments on bomb scares are depressingly calm and matter of fact; I went to high school in the ‘70’s in suburban Philadelphia, never a one. Depressing how things have deteriorated.

I like you.

This scenario seems the one the one that would cause the most havoc and probably what the initial plan was.

“Auntie Mame” ?

I am not the one conflating two distinct issues into one. A ban on assault rifles ( favored by 59 to 65% of Americans polled depending on how the question is phrased) is an entirely separate issue from whether a gun owner should have insurance.They are 2 entirely separate discussions you are the one deciding they are…

Oh but Snookums I’m not looking to be sole arbiter of anything, I’m just expressing the views of something like 60% or more of Americans that support a ban on assault rifles and high capacity magazines/clips, 60% or so of Americans are expressing the same opinion as me that private citizens do not need assault rifles.…

... and use varying accents

And everyone whose carry permit has been revoked stops carrying ? There is no way to insure that other than by sporadic stop and frisk pat downs of those that have had their carry licenses suspended, that will never happen. Meanwhile if you continue to drive after license suspension there are a multitude of ways that…