Who cares? Stop. Covering. These. Idiots. It's that simple. The more you put them on your website, the more traffic you give them, the more visible you make them— the less likely it is that they will go away anytime soon. Ignore them.
Who cares? Stop. Covering. These. Idiots. It's that simple. The more you put them on your website, the more traffic you give them, the more visible you make them— the less likely it is that they will go away anytime soon. Ignore them.
Technically speaking, everything he says someone else said is hearsay. I mean, only in a technical sense... if you believe the dictionary.
Yeah, 26 rounds of .22 Long Rifle, perfect for plinking at cans and targets.
Ok,just to be fair, the "high-capacity" gun is a .22, which, while it can cause serious damage at very close range (i.e., shooting yourself in the foot or playing russian roulette), is, as they said, not much good for anything other than pest control. It's like the training bra of guns.
Can I be openly honest for a second and maybe please don't take my head off? Please? Ok.
I am shocked and appalled that a company that makes duck calls would dare to put their logo on guns.
My god! The audacity of this family to use their rights as Americans to earn a living! (They have a legal brand, product, and market. Get over it bleeding hearts...and vaginas). It's almost like we live in a democracy with freedom of speech/religion and a free market economy.....
You're wrong - it's hearsay.
I don't see why you think any lawsuit can compensate for the kind of public damage this kind of story does. There's no justification for buying into what Kluwe is saying as hard and as uncritically as the readers here have, other than that Kluwe is a hip liberal crusader who plays video games.
Sure, but there's reasons to think Kluwe isn't credible. Mainly, he got fired and has no one to substantiate what he is saying.
Many people here are treating the statement "priefer said gays should be nuked" like it's fact. That is the 'hearsay' problem. You are correct that you could have nonhearsay uses, and that this isn't a trial, so I was not trying to make a legal argument either way. I just wanted to establish that it's wrong to say…
Well, yes, that was the point of my post.
Heh, having just taken a few law school evidence exams, I think I do. A statement can be hearsay even if it's repeated by someone who heard it firsthand.
It sounds great in theory, but here's the reality:
Totally unsubstantiated hearsay from one publicity-seeking punter should tank a guy's career? Right.
I kind of agree with this guy sometimes, but he writes like a high school student with a thesaurus.
This motherfucker again? God, this guy loves to hear himself talk shit. Fuck you Deadspin.
Relax, dude. He's just a kicker.
Punters and kickers belong in their own separate hall of fame. One that no one will go to or care about.
Oh, look. A punter with an opinion. Cute.