teageegeepea
TGGP
teageegeepea

Cliff exists within the world of the film, so the question is whether that really happened in the film’s continuity. I say it only makes sense as a flashback which explains why Cliff is persona-non-grata anywhere that stunt coordinator has pull.

They’re hippies, shown flipping the bird and yelling “PIG!” at cops. They’re not going to The Man for help. This isn’t a film about corruption with the LAPD either. Having them encounter each other again by coincidence actually would be in keeping with the film.

Sense8 got a wrapup movie.

Since she has supporting characters here, perhaps the camera could turn around to reveal she’s talking to them, like Chief Wiggum asked by Dr. Hibbert to solve Mr. Burns’ shooting.

Kids are much safer today than 30 years ago. But, on the other hand, childhood should involve taking some moderate risks of which they are currently deprived.

It does seem like music got suckier around the time I became a teenager, because the universe dislikes me.

I wasn’t being sarcastic. The Manson family members subjected to violence here absolutely have it coming.

You’re onto something there with the coincidental nature of them running into him again, but the Manson family is not capable of “running plates”. They’re hippies, not law enforcement, and your idea of them having some connection with the LAPD that will help them out is sillier than random coincidence causing them to

After The Tick’s cancellation, I suppose that is your best source for tick-related content.

I didn’t observe him, but I read later that he’s in a mid-credits scene as a commercial director. I left when the credits started, so I guess I’ll watch it when it hits Netflix, although a film this long doesn’t need the extended version people are talking about.

He probably should spend more time with his new wife and less getting drunk on their first day together at his house. Particularly at the end of the film where he goes over to drink more with the neighbors.

I was going to say that Tarantino’s films are still successful, but then I remembered that Clint Eastwood still has hits even if his “first take is always good enough” approach leads to a lot of misses as well.

I found his narration in Hateful 8 stranger than Russell’s here. Although it is odd that he pops up in the beginning to contradict the drunk driving claim, and then not again until the time skip and last act of the film.

Multiple accusations have been made about him raping underage girls, it’s possible he gets busted on a different one. And then, as Steve McQueen predicts in the film, Jay Sebring will be there for Sharon.

I think they’ll get a divorce. Partly due to Hollywood stereotypes, partly due to Rick’s immaturity and the lack of interaction between him & Francesca, lastly because the film ends with him leaving the house to drink with the Polanski friends. If your wife gets attacked, you should try to make sure you’re there for

Manson didn’t send a backup car in case the first one failed.

I think the problem is that Tarantino himself is very much a product of that, and he really loves the 70s much more than the 50s.

I know many people compare Rick Dalton to Tarantino, but Tarantino is still quite successful. There was lots of competition from studios for him after the Weinsteins went under, he doesn’t have to go to Europe to film things like Woody Allen.

I know that some people have written that precisely because it’s been so long there may be young people now unfamiliar with those events.

I know the hippies are set up to be exploiting Spahn as far as Cliff would view things, but it also has Spahn show that he really is blind and just wants to have his TV time with Squeaky. Nobody else is going to take care of Spahn, to the menacing Manson crew don’t come across that way to him.