Why is that surprising or weird?

I don't think you can dismiss "totally changing the entire essence of the band" as a petty reason. Metallica made their bones on being unaplogetically thrashy and uncompromising. The incredible bond they forged with their audience was severely weakened with the Black Album and utterly destroyed with the makeup and…

No, Eddie was naked in the gunfight with the mobsters, which Roland explained was an extremely difficult thing to do and a sign that Eddie was a gunslinger.

After Terminus, wouldn't any meeting with an unknown group of others be treated with the utmost suspicion? Shouldn't the group look at every meeting as a potential attack by cannibals? So why would the ENTIRE LEADERSHIP of the group go off in the RV? Do you really need Rick, Daryl, Maggie, Glen, Abraham and…

A- ?? A-??
That may have been the worst episode of the entire series. The Dukes of Hazzard slapstick with the truck ending up gurgling in the lake was beyond laughable. Ridiculously stupid decisions piled up on top of each other in a jumble. This show is lost.

ha, i saw that tour. Radiohead was unmemorable except for Creep (seriously). Thom Yorke came out and sang with Tanya on either Stay or Untogether.

The reason their second album failed to connect is simple - the songs were not that good. The first album (Star) on the other hand, was really, really good. Solid, well-written, hooky songs from top to bottom. A little dated but still hold up very well.

I think Fiona is probably the prettiest girl in the room in real life, but that her good lucks don't necessarily translate to "sexbomb" (ala Sharon Stone) on the big screen. She might have been better suited for a role where her attractiveness was a more understated part of the script.

It's not often a relevant topic of conversation, so let me take the opportunity to say that I saw Fiona live, opening for Bryan Adams on the Reckless tour.

The zombies at the gates sure were leaving a lot of room for each other. No aggressive crowding or pushing at the walls, only do that when it suits the writer's purpose.

1 ?

I'm shocked the Walking Dead sometimes forgets that there should be some semblance of logic, even in a zombie apocalypse.

He goes to the same salon as Darryl, obviously.

No, Carol's "kill on sight" approach is pure pragmatic survival. it has nothing to do with internal, only external. She and Morgan are not two sides of a coin.

Exactly. Can't really say there are any well written characters, just varying degrees of likeability/charisma.

Yeah, I found this unwatchable, between his wooden line readings and hoarse voice. Funny or die usually means die. it's never funny.

Um, did you read the actual Tumblr? It is most definitely not a "backstory" for each casualty. It's simply a paragraph on each of the character's final thoughts as they're being killed. The former is much more of a creative idea with actual meaning. The actual execution is mostly meh.

Jesus Christ though, Darryl dropping the water jug might have been the single worst piece of acting on the entire series.

I seemed to remember Andrea saying "You're the one they call the Governor," and was like "Aw shucks, I'm just Brian"

He wasn't bad in Oz. I'll take him as a character actor on the TWD.