Because they wanted people to think they came up with something 2x faster than USB 3.0.

And you're basing this on what specifics?

At $3.03, I'm loving my 3-cyl 1.0L Geo Metro everyday!

Looks like someone stretched a GT-R

@rotaryfreakjoe: Yet, she probably has more than many out there.

Wow, how many versions are we all going to buy. First there were the originals, then the special editions, then DVD, then the prequels, now the Blu-Ray, & then in 5-6 years there will be the 3D editions. Insane.

@bahsura: I agree, they're awesome. I've used all monoprice products for my 120" projected 6.1 theater. All audio and video cables, including 30ft HDMI, produce excellent quality. There wall receptacles make for a clean look as well. I've also used them to rewire the entire house for CAT5. I've never had an issue…

@Dab O' Swine: Juke, the new Aztek.

@Tom Fuller: Let's see you continue to say this when when your BMW fails you and you have to sputter 40+ miles to the closest dealer for a fix. Not to mention having to miss work or anything important while dealing with the issue.

@hntergren: Certainly you can dream higher than 3GB.

@RedRaider: Despite what your deductible may be, if the policy states that is covered, then it IS covered. Sounds like you need to check out different insurance providers.

@chickennakatsu: Thanks for clarifying that. That's what I meant to say. It's best, and cheaper to do a bunch of images at once since it's a flat fee. Also embedding your information into the image's exif data is a great way to prove an image is yours.

@chickennakatsu: Yep, which is why you copyright images.

@StickyPickle: Even worse...those plastic, chrome spinners on 12in wheels!

So, there's no home network integration for personal media? I'd love to be able to stream media files to this.

@GiantOctopus: Works fine for me. You FAIL.

@LANjackal: No, it's because monitors/HDTVs display at a standard of 72 dpi. Your images on a display will look just as they would as a print. You're welcome!

If you're a photographer, whether it be an amateur or pro, you should resize your images to 72dpi for uploading to the web. This way your image will appear sharp on any monitor, yet keep anyone from saving it as their own and making a decent print out of it. It'll also be much faster uploading than a high-res file.

@chickennakatsu: Content Aware will mostly take care of that. Unless you've got plastered across your subject, thus rendering the image useless for viewing.

@lordargent: As a professional photographer myself, I'll still continue to resize to 72dpi. My pictures will still look crisp and sharp on any monitor, and they'll still upload much faster than a full res image. Also, this prevents others from taking my stuff and printing somewhere while expecting a quality print.