tasharobinson--disqus
TashaRobinson
tasharobinson--disqus

Seems to me that politics is all about transparent pandering, @avclub-0f2a88b3b0df4b2cca4df1e6c67af432:disqus . I'm not too worried about losing an election solely by graphically overstating my love of country, democracy, freedom, and the flag. USA! USA! (Am I president yet?)

Not as far as I've seen, but it may depend on your local theater.

Not as far as I've seen, but it may depend on your local theater.

The colors are beautiful. The backgrounds are beautiful. The characters are rendered… erratically. Case in point, three different versions of the cat:

The colors are beautiful. The backgrounds are beautiful. The characters are rendered… erratically. Case in point, three different versions of the cat:

Heh. Interesting idea. Have you heard that Nickelback mashup that suggests their songs are exactly alike? It turns that into basically an echo chamber that just jumps back and forth infinitely.

Heh. Interesting idea. Have you heard that Nickelback mashup that suggests their songs are exactly alike? It turns that into basically an echo chamber that just jumps back and forth infinitely.

Give us a link, man, we can't ALL upload it!

Give us a link, man, we can't ALL upload it!

What I find interesting about that is that it's picky about what "In the background" means. It doesn't mind being backgrounded behind MS Word or Mail (which account for half my work) or even behind some other Chrome pages, but it doesn't seem to want me to play music and then surf the web with it in the background.

What I find interesting about that is that it's picky about what "In the background" means. It doesn't mind being backgrounded behind MS Word or Mail (which account for half my work) or even behind some other Chrome pages, but it doesn't seem to want me to play music and then surf the web with it in the background.

Like the article says, it only works on Chrome and Safari.

Like the article says, it only works on Chrome and Safari.

Nobody among the staffers would be crushed if all the people on our list came out as neo-Nazi child-sacrificing kitten-rapers tomorrow. We'd just be kinda disappointed. As @avclub-6997a8bd0e1042b70b60c5c879a1780e:disqus and @avclub-c156902f5b20b572848be18c11634dfb:disqus  say below, it's nice to be able to respect

Nobody among the staffers would be crushed if all the people on our list came out as neo-Nazi child-sacrificing kitten-rapers tomorrow. We'd just be kinda disappointed. As @avclub-6997a8bd0e1042b70b60c5c879a1780e:disqus and @avclub-c156902f5b20b572848be18c11634dfb:disqus  say below, it's nice to be able to respect

Oh, I did. Noel and I did a big Crosstalk analyzing it.

Oh, I did. Noel and I did a big Crosstalk analyzing it.

Nope, not at all.

Nope, not at all.

I thought 11/22/63 was his best book since… geesh, I guess Wizard And Glass in 1997. And probably since Needful Things before that. Very, very different from Pet Sematary (which I agree is pants-wettingly scary), but such a solid, thought-through plot compared to his seat-of-the-pants thrillers where everyone is