Wow. Just wow. Hadn't even thought to check that; good observation. Bright side is, that user seems to be a disaffected, semi-literate teen who can probably be bought out of his Twitter account for a dime bag and a sandwich.

On top of everything else that seems short-sighted and dumb about this decision, "Qwikster"? Just makes me think of the Nestle Quik Bunny.

He just got a few more seconds' worth, too — the review of his book just posted.

I've never read a single Sherlock Holmes story, myself, though I'm familiar with a lot of the story's conventions just due to osmosis. So I got some of the many specific references. But we were introduced to the show by a Holmes superfan who pointed out a bunch more very specific ones; I suspect people familiar with…

The real version is a wee bit more coherent. This automatic transcription reads like poetry by a 6-year-old.

Ah, thanks for the link. Someone was just telling me about this, and I wanted to track it down.

This is your movie, Pinkie. Tiger sharks, hammerheads, and cookiecutter sharks (of all things) represent!

Ha! That makes far more sense. Have fun.

Largely to get help for the one who was attacked, though there are eventually other considerations that play into that whole half-assed "plot" thing.

I just don't think it tells us anything about these characters that we didn't already know. Everything you're talking about had already been established by that point, and would be established further, in less cartoonish, excessive ways.

Now see, there are so many interesting, insightful, respectful, detailed arguments going on in this thread, and you had to take it down to kindergarten level. Tsk.

Really? Tulane's only in it for a few minutes at the beginning. And for all I know, it wasn't even shot there, since you mostly see dorm interiors. But if you absolutely must, you could just watch the opening few minutes. They aren't scary, because **MAJOR SPOILERS** no one gets attacked by a shark during the…

No. So bad, it felt like no one was trying (except a few of the actors, who gamely throw themselves into it), and it just isn't worth showing up for.

The 3D isn't bad, it's just really inessential. There are a couple of perfunctory "things fly at your eyes" moments, one of which is actually kind of funny, and a fast-driving sequence that's a little neat, but otherwise, the movie really does nothing whatsoever with the 3D. Absolutely not worth the upcharge.

I have never seen a SyFy original movie all the way through.

Inevitably, some of you will see this hunk o' crap anyway. If you do, stay through the credits. There's a music video at the end that's more self-aware and funny than nearly anything in the film itself.

Um, SPOILERS?

*applauds amusing comment thread, claps too hard, such that the impact causes both hands to snap off at the wrists, spraying the computer monitor and cubicle walls with blood from severed arteries. bleeds to death while looking very, very puzzled*

Couldn't say; I didn't see that one in 3D.

Honestly, that's true. Also, her performance of it features some of the film's best dancing and most ambitious choreography. It's staged as a big spectacular Britney Spears/Prince sex-em-up number instead of the High School Musical everybody-run-around-the-stage numbers that dominate the film.