Why is this piece not attributed to any one author?

She’s right to do so, however.

The only way Hamlet would work as a game is if your objective was to somehow prevent every single thing that happens in the book, except the death of Claudius somehow. I’d be really curious to see how that played out.

“We want to bring back these interesting, deep characters—a child of divorce, a recovering drug addict, an alcoholic…”

It’s implying the mediocre times following that galactic civil war and proceeding…whatever the fuck was happening in the sequel trilogy.

Now that you mention it, there’s no proof that Chet Hanks didn’t sell his dad’s visage to a Russian dental insurance scam.

Oh, uhhh…Barney!

Can you imagine the smug look of satisfaction on their face while typing that phrase out?

There are enough people who joke “ACAB means all cops including Paw Patrol” that there are probably a few who take it seriously. Imagining that these people wield any kind of power or influence though is deeply credulous.

As a rare fan of The Village, I will not stand for this BDH slander.

All I know about her is that Trent Reznor respects her because his kids like her. And she did a music video where she tips her cowboy hat to the camera like ten times.

Are you called Cruz a mark-assed buster? Because kudos if so.

I typed out a really great two paragrah explanation for why Marvel needs this to work. Then the site reset. Fuck all’ah y’all.

We’re still doing that whole thing, huh?

So I’m not going to be able to use the word “seemingly” for the next decade or so without it being construed in this context? We really are in the dumbest timeline.

Didn’t Beals also play a Twi’lek? Really makes you think.

Well, that is not how this played out. I guess some people take the small stuff real seriously.

Were that the case he should be drowning in pudding.

The article is titled

Right. Why would men discuss a controversy that affects them directly when they can have a hot take on how to behave at a concert?