Since these batteries are graded to put out between 90 and 300 kW of power, Roadshow also speculates that the i4 will utilize two batteries—the amount it would need to hit the 390 kW of power needed to translate into 530 horses.

Maybe it’s time for Ferrari to do what Leica did: make a ‘stealth’ edition

I’ve been doodling solutions like this for RVs for a long time. Particularly ones that slide out like this Citroën, but without necessarily having wheels for the hind most part. Or ones that slide the whole side of the vehicle out sideways.

The ‘54 was not so bad- it was the ‘49 to ‘53 Olds that seemed to alternate between flipping your eyelids inside out, having a pair of unfortunate growths just underneath the eyes, or the aftermath of a truly epic coke bender. 

Also, those prancing horses in yellow would be a daily reminder of the fundamental naffness of the Ferrari brand.

Yeah, but, that Shoebox, tho...

Like so:

Flemish is a variety of Dutch- the Flemish went to great lengths to make it so.

へて

And the ones everybody wants are bone stock.

The Netherlands, which, if anything, is even more mind blowing. It did happen, though:

I wasn’t sure, but that’s why I used ‘site’ rather than ‘plant’.

Indeed, though the only ones that could be called people’s cars were the DKWs that were made there from 1931 on.

Quite poignant that the new People’s Car will be made on the site where the old GDR used to make theirs, the Trabant, until almost 30 years ago today.

Oh, well,

I just realised it has been there all along. Very quietly.

Getting a strong Blue Ruin vibe ... which isn’t necessarily a bad thing.

Apologies- you’re quite right. I mixed up the Zetros Bliss Mobil with this Unimog Bimobil

While a BT is indubitably the better choice for a double date, I’d be tempted to loose the other couple and go for the more rakish CT

The Germans just looove their Expeditionsmobile. In the forthcoming Caravan Salon 2019, at least three will make their debuts, including this very similar one from Bliss Mobil, but on Unimog rather than MAN: