taodude-old
taodude
taodude-old

A thing of beauty. Sadly, that picture is as close as I can afford to get to one.

No.

Yeah, linking social sites to search results is bad. Social sites were made to be linked to techblogs. Everyone knows that.

Twisting it off disables it? Is this in an apartment or condo, being monitored by someone else? If so, then THEY are getting a trouble alarm every time you do that.

Oh, dear! Shameful.

Breaks my heart. It's too bad the sables don't have hungry lawyers.

I've got both Google and Facebook accounts, but I will not be using either to cross-log in, nor will I go through the BS of creating a special, separate account just for the Gawker boards. I guess I just won't be posting any more.

Fry eggs? Wow, that thing really CAN do everything.

Her stock is downright magnificent.

Oh, man, I want some of those!

Paper is surprisingly hard and CDs are surprisingly soft. I've used this technique for short-lived CDs that I've made for file distribution, but not for anything important. Paper sleeves, even the "real" store-bought ones, are alright for archives where you are not frequently moving the disc, but that's it.

That's just cinematic license. Fights are dramatically choreographed. Sound effects are enhanced. Space ships make noise in space as they move too slowly while constantly burning their engines... then those spaceships have no trouble stopping even though their ONLY engines are behind them.

I could live with the fire for a split second, but SPIT? Ewww.

You just need to remember that Unix and its offshoots are case-sensitive. If you have a program named "blech" and you try to run "Blech" you will be told that there is no such file. If you are coming from the DOS/Win world then this may seem to be a pain, but then again a *nix user may find Windows' little quirks to

In the future, every app will have its own set of gestures, and people will rely on gesture managers to keep them all straight.

If Warner can not be held responsible for bogus takedowns, why should ISPs and innocent users be held responsible for the violations of others?

Millions of what? Not dollars, surely. That's the sort of creative accounting that the RIAA would be proud of.

It would be the best way to go, but I'm afraid the people making the decisions and the people making the machines are too cozy together, and neither is interested in any form of transparency.

Sounds like they've got some real rocket scientists in charge of security down at NASA.