Then who’s problem is that really?

Lol. So you think that those “roles and responsibilities” include buying depreciating assets for an average of $34,000?

You have no data to make that connection. None. At. All. Again, let’s look at what the article is claiming... That sales are down 2.3% *from estimates*. But in the same paragraph they acknowledge last year’s vehicle sales (17+ million.) Which was higher than at any point in the last 40 years.

Are you serious? Do you have any appreciation for how shit-pile cars were even 30 years ago? Just one example -

I real sales trends go sufficiently negative, then yes. That will happen to some extent, at least as far as government regulation will allow.

I’m going to be honest about your confession. You sound childish complaining about these things. Welcome to adulthood, where there’s nobody willing to take on the roll of your parents who just gave you new toys to play with (purchased from who-knows-where and paid for with who-knows-what) pick them up and put them…

If you want the best deal, play the game. If you value your time and frustration level, pay a tiny bit more.

Never take your family with you to close the deal. You’re just making it worse on yourself.

Dammit you lot! Buy more new sports cars off dealer lots so I can buy them from you for 50 cents on the dollar 3 years from now.

Everybody dies...

Kid’s books on technical and scientific subjects tend to be easy to read because they often completely ignore the complexities to the point that they no longer properly convey what is really going on. That or they pick one part or even one side of a topic that is not fully known, and presents limited information as if…

Agree with you here. I’m an engineer too, and all I could think about when reading this blog was how a lot of the things you learn about the hard sciences as kids is simplified to the point of being wrong.

I would guess (I have no dog in this fight as I really don’t care about sports) that it is now an issue because of the rise of the trans argument. Now that there is a vocal presence of trans women looking to compete in women’s athletics, one of the justification metrics has been testosterone level. IE, if the formerly…

I said I didn’t read the document, or watch the hearing. I didn’t say I ignored it. But thanks for the numbered list, it generates more questions.

Agreed. When I read the tagline I assumed the article was talking about one of the race officials making a really uncharacteristic comment about future regulations. Alas, it's just a commonsense comment from a butthurt driver.

I must agree. Potty mouth is so simple and easy. Try to be more creative.

I could see potentially voting for some of the Dem candidates, assuming they don’t sell their souls in order to win primaries. But some of them are straight-up no chance to get my vote and would in fact cause me to actually go out and vote for Trump, just to keep them from office (I didn’t vote for the top spot in 16…

WTF are you talking about? After 2 years 25 million and all this bullshit theater, YOU know there’s things that nobody else knows...? Seriously, you guys make Mel Gibson look level headed.

Alright, so what’s the proposal now? Another investigation to investigate the AG covering up the report that found no cover-up?

I was asking for fellow commenters here to provide their insight. If that bothers you, just move along.