Don’t care. The world doesn’t have time to stop and listen to how you are the super-special edge case for “not all dogs.”
Don’t care. The world doesn’t have time to stop and listen to how you are the super-special edge case for “not all dogs.”
No. The fact that the government forcibly controls pretty much all of their economy, as well as their citizen's personal lives, means they are socialists regardless of what they call themselves.
Good theory to channel your dysfunction against. But not borne out by historical facts.
I’ve only read websites...
Read this book. It is a chillingly depressing look at just how *normal people* can be made to do/say/think horrible things.
They are called “useful idiots” for a reason.
No. Leash your fucking dog.
No. This is socialism running its course. Read some history. It's all there.
Yeah, none of that is how it happened.
Yes. BotW but with dungeons; and a story that progresses throughout the game, instead of one that you run around and pick up all the pieces of right before you go fight Ganon.
Contact high. The Helmsman standing next to him at the wheel was reeling from the fumes coming off him.
I feel that way about pretty much all the games with that mechanic (have to revert to a previous save) but honestly I think I would feel alternately annoyed if the game suggested there’s more to do after I beat the end boss so keep playing... ...Basically I just don’t like it when I’ve “beaten" a game and have yo say…
Weapons get better and you learn to not just run up to enemies and wack repeatedly at their shields.
Right now I’m playing through Dragon Quest 11 and honestly, there’s at least once or twice per session that I think, oh I’d like to go see what is on the other side of that cliff... Then I think, I miss BotW.
I realize the rear end of an SUV is always the section of the vehicle that receives no styling thought at all, but this takes it further than most.
And if they did, none of us would complain.
Perhaps. But everybody gets a chance to voice their opinion. It’s up to him if he wants to try to make it an opinion that is more than just silly name calling.
You can have compassion for someone’s situation while still looking at it objectively.
Come on, have some integrity. Yeah, it’s easy to google for “disabilities” and then find weblinks to articles about it. But did you actually take 2 minutes to read some of those links?
And, again, the argument of “you’re mad about this, so are you going to personally address it?” is a glib, stupid argument. It brings utterly nothing to the discussion, and is deployed as a way of shutting up people who have the apparent gall to speak out against something they don’t like.