So according to your brilliant (and stupid) logic, just because no one can afford it that means we can't say we don't like the look of it?
Design is subjective. To each their own. People are 100% allowed to not like how this car looks, despite them not being able to afford it.
t_s
t_s
Hallelujah.
Honda F20C. 8,900 RPM red line and the highest specific output of a NA engine at the time, and still the highest of a series production car (I don't consider the 458 Speciale or a Caparo T1 to be a series production car). It was also in an attainable vehicle, especially compared to other vehicles with engines with…
Honda F20, massive specific output for the masses. Reliable (I'm touching wood), gloriously revvy and showered with accolades from its launch until its untimely demise.
Now playing
Well here are two carbon monocoque accidents at a higher speed into a solid wall:
Concussions and a few broken bones.... I'd say that is the absolute best outcome given the crash...
How about the Tipo Due? There were so many cars built from this platform, by at least three different automakers (Fiat, Alfa and Lancia), featuring several different engines (the Lancia Thema could be had with a V8 or a DOHC four, for example), different types of drive (FWD and AWD both made rounds on Tipo Due cars)…
Am I doing it right?
How about this novel concept: instead of trying to find mirrors (i.e. attempting to pirate copyrighted material, the owner of which isn't ready to release it) why not just wait until the people who invested the time and money into the production release the video next week? This isn't some embargoed media on a new car…
This. No explanation necessary.
I just can't watch this. I saw another video posted on FB Sunday, and could not watch it either. I saw the beginning, then stopped. I think it was of a blue BMW pulling up near the scene. Then I stopped it.
1. Cheaper to service/rebuild
I would like everybody here to just sit back and think about this:
It's fucking drifting.
"I can't splash any lower"