Explore our other sites
  • jalopnik
  • kotaku
  • quartz
  • theroot
  • theinventory
    t_s
    t_s
    t_s

    Ferrari's bottom line isn't bad at all. As for their draconian policies, they only appear to be an issue on Jalopnik.

    Please do share your in-depth insight into driving the LaFerrari.

    Ford 20 M TS OSI Coupé.

    I honestly don't see the point. The C7 stands head and shoulders above anything else on the market in terms of value for money. I can understand the need for a supercar model, a sort of super-Corvette if you will, but to my eyes that should be a clean sheet of paper design, with little or no carry over from the

    E30 M3.

    Forgive me, I phrased that wrong, what I meant to say was that his claim (which was only speculation, no Italian media has actually confirmed it) is about how Ferrari will be run in the future. As for the second part, I would agree with you, were it not for the fact that Ferrari's financial results in recent years

    Depends who you ask really. Allegedly both Brawn and Todt left because of issues with Montezemolo. As for Montezemolo not having anything to do with their success, again, I'm not so sure. It was definitely Brawn designing the car and Todt calling the shots, but without a strong leader to get these folks on board and

    However by that same token, if we were to look at his run as head of Ferrari, the whole time, the F1 team didn't exactly suck did it? Ok, we're in lean years now, and things were a bit poor to begin with, but over that whole period of time it wasn't as bad as Marchionne would like us to believe.

    You can only control the exclusivity of new ones, secondhand ones can be purchased by all and sundry. I've even got one for god's sake. As for his 'American' comment, Bloomberg cites Italian news sources. Unfortunately those Italian news sources only speculate that he said that, there's no direct quote of Montezemolo

    The fact that F1 is the most important aspect is debatable. Marchionne's pragmatic approach to running FCA is all about the bottom line and profitability. Ferrari delivers that in spades. His statement that the F1 results of the last six years being sub-par, while true, is an excuse, he just wanted Montezemolo out

    Here's an interesting alternative. Posting a reasoned argument from your perspective, however I realize that may be a bit much to ask for this early in the day.

    What about Marchionne's comments about nobody being indispensable or his excuses that the F1 team isn't performing, while conventiently forgetting the extremely positive financials that Ferrari keeps posting? I'll take mine with milk and two sugars please.

    Because for Italians Ferrari is more than a car. And Sergio's going to drag it down the toilet.

    Montezemolo's claim isn't about the nationality, it's about the way Ferrari is run.

    It's not a rant, it's a statement of fact. But for some reason Jalopnik has its hands firmly around Sergio's member so we can't go polluting his angelic countanance now can we?

    Utter fucking cock. He didn't "leave in a huff," he was forced out by Marchionne. Get your facts straight before posting clickbait headlines or go back to masturbating over Saabs.

    Would it qualify even if it was never legal in its country of origin? I think the reason that this car keeps popping up for sale is because nobody can register it and it's far too valuable to be a track hack.

    Unfortunately it's not usable on the road.

    The amount of technology under the hood of any production Ferrari today begs to differ.

    Why is this a problem? I'm not trying to be deliberately obtuse, I'd like to understand.