truuu. blogity blog blog blog

Well yeah, but you can choose to stand with your colleagues who are asking for fair remuneration. Or you can be a scab and side with the exploitative employer, like these lads have done.

disagree

YOWZA!!!!! I love this

ugh, thank you. summarised everything that is wrong with this dopey article.

xactly. theres nothing really wrong with what he said, but it has been twisted for this cheap ass click bait article. he’s saying that some people place a high priority on voting for a woman, if possible, which he says is understandable. For him as a non woman, that poses the problem that he has a tougher time…

enjoyed your mixed metaphor about floating boats that don’t fly.  You need a seaplane! <3

that’s some quality.

harry styles is 18? 

sounds pretty trolly over here.

its true, i never thought about that but maybe the most convincing bro - sis on any show ever??

I liked it then aged 16 and i still quite like the scenes i occasionally se if you tube sugggests them to me.

since we’re talking concièrges, you’re sure to love this.

It’s still cruel and unusual, and its still unconstitutional. It’s not about ‘defending paedophiles’ it’s about the rule of law.

Thanks, but I’ll pass.

jesus, this film sounds like a total bummer.

you see their penises and you don’t want to? maybe tell them. Just because they’re fam doesn’t mean you should have to unwantedly see peen. ugh

yaaaaaaaas! This is the best take.

How are you not even mentioning her name before just calling her ‘wife of [whatever her husband’s name is]’ in your article????