Would it make more sense to simply disqualify such women from competing in the women’s events?

Have you ever seen a Cecilia D’Anastasio article calling out a Luke Plunkett article for harnessing (someone else’s) sex appeal to monetize (someone else’s) content?

Fair enough, though I hold out hope this isn’t one of those cases.

It’s okay, I use an adblocker.

Developers have changed content in response to community preferences in the past, and will again.

I mean, if anything this proves your point!

DICE isn’t.... developing this.

Heya, thanks for responding - I’m sincerely curious about what situations this advice applies to.

Two problems with your response:

In climbing gyms the walls have several times as many anchor points as you’d have holds up at any one time, and they rotate which anchors are in use pretty frequently. Seems like Cool Dad (tm) could do the same thing here pretty easily.

Here: http://bfy.tw/HPHA

70% of adults can be wrong about something.

I’m really disappointed in the Kotaku community that I have to be the first to point out that that’s actually an épée.

Yeah, men who say women aren’t allowed to crush cats to death on Twitch in high heels can drop the fuck dead. Smash the patriarchy!

Speaking as someone with no dog in the fight, I find both “1632143" and “63214789 632147896" pretty intuitive descriptions.

Lol, yeah, it’s definitely that Yellow Peril that’s the problem.

“I don’t use a computer to read web content, and my friends don’t use computers to read web content, therefore nobody does”

This seems like the sort of article Lifehacker staff might read the comments to, so.

Edit - Replaced with a slightly less-large image. Also: “But there are REEEE-SAAAAHHNS why you could truncate if... if... if...”

Anyone who enjoys the franchise should play it. It’s by far the best entry since at least Brotherhood, and might be the best entry, period.