Pedantry alert: She doesn't use it as singular. She clarifies that it is plural.

Well, Oldman was okay…he is usually on the top of my list for everything, but the only reason he somewhat worked as Sirius was because Sirius supposedly aged premature in Azkaban…not that you see the effect when everyone else is cast too old, too.
Rickman's Age wasn't really that much of a problem in the first movie,…

The moment Voldemort killed Harry, Harry cast the same protection his mother gave him over everyone, because he died for all of them. The whole point of the final fight is that Voldemort lost, because he had no understanding for love. He didn't understand that Snape loved Lily, he wasn't prepared for her sacrifice,…

*rolls eye* they are light models. Someone recently told me that the movie is r-rated in the US and I couldn't believe it…the rating in Germany is PG! Not even PG-13, PG!

By totally missing the point of the story? I don't think so!

Nah, it's because it is a lot of movies in one. That makes it an ideal watch for families, because there it at least one story for everyone.

Harry had very young parents, who died when they were barely twenty (and were also cast way too old for the movies). Consequently Snape was in his early 30th when Harry arrived at Hogwarts, no quite 40 when he died. It's part of the tragic of the characters.

Azkaban is the only movie which managed to nearly (they should have left out the annoying shrunken heads) hit the sweet spot between capturing the essence of the story while still being a movie. The first two movies were too slavish to the books, the last four were so concerned with action beats that they turned the…

Yeah, big mistake. You like the movies? The books are ten times better!

Which was quite a feat considering that he was acutally to old for the role. Snape should have been a guy in his early 30th.

My favourite part was always the light models - but honestly, this would be a perfect movie if not for the stupid story of the guy who travels to the US to get laid. Take that out and I would have nothing to complain about. Great cast, great writing and so much fun!

Yeah, it is easily Disney's cheapest movie, but it is actually one of its best. I think partly because the animators knew to spend the little money they had on the right things.

Yeah, I like the movie (sadly Germany screwed it up by putting a new dubbing on it - since then it has become unwatchable for me, since I liked the original dub - solves the problem with the accents, among other things). It is still one of my favourite takes on the story. And it made me see spoons in a totally new…

Thanks for proving my point….
Who the heck cares? You either enjoy Sherlock or not. You either enjoy Elementary or not. Sherlock is the more successful show, but Elementary will not become more popular from tearing Sherlock down.

Why should a Sherlock Holmes series be about mysteries? Most Sherlock Holmes stories aren't, they are usually adventures, the mystery aspect are just details. Which we also get here. Drug hallucination or not, the case of the bride was real, meaning we were free to solve it.

But the case with the bride was solvable for the audience. It was a working case within the mind-palace.
Only problem was, though, that I actually did solve it the moment Watson mentioned the consumption.

Nah, we who enjoy the show are just tired to fight with the loud minority. The episode was great.

I didn't know that progressive stands for mind-numbing bland.

You didn't pay attention, did you? He meet Emilia Ricoletti in the states, promised her marriage and then left her alone, ruined and destitute after he had his way with her.

Wrong website…the people here are still intend on proving that Elementary is better than Sherlock.