Ugh, are you really going to pander to someone who's made heroes out of people too stupid to operate condoms?

You ladies realize that tissues are jerk off supplies, right?

I don't get the people on this site. Didn't a bunch of you get angry at what was perceived to be a "flippant" post about teen girls joining up with ISIS just this past week?

This is going to turn out to be a giant scam, like Amway.

The first thing that popped into my mind looking at these pictures: "You wear too much eye makeup. My sister wears too much. People think she's a whore."

"And wasn't it also so funny when I helped the Iranians get away with killing some Jews? Ha ha ha!"

If there's no double blind study, it might as well be a flying spaghetti monster.

This merits at least the same amount of mockery as white dues who fetishize Asian women.

Do you really want to live in a society where there are sacred cows that can never be mocked?

Maybe they can stay in Dubai?

At the end of the day this profile reveals the simple truth that being smart and creative is not always compatible with making lot of money for the investors. And the shareholders absolutely have a right to be pissed off.

She won't bankrupt it. What will happen is that the large shareholders will just decide that the Yahoo property, in and of itself, is not making money, so they'll oust her (as is their right as the owners of the company), take the profit of selling the stake in Alibaba, and liquidate the rest of the assets, including…

The point of the comment is not to "belittle" her. It's to point out that she wanted to shift the content away from what was attractive to those in the 99% income bracket to that of her 1% income bracket. What they're getting at is Yahoo is the Kmart of internet companies, and they can't hope to revive themselves by…

I was always under the impression that Whitman's tenure at eBay had been good for the investors. That was not the case?

I really want them to bring back Bruce Mathis on Sunny and have him deliver really tasteless lines about being a child molester, just to humiliate Collins. It's not like he'll be getting paid acting work again otherwise.

How much?

The problem is not Jackie, it's the complete lack of fact checking on the part of the RS writer. If there were discrepancies that couldn't be accounted for, but the author still believed that, underneath, there had been some kind of sexual assault, perhaps the writer shouldn't have made specific claims about the…

You keep conflating the use of a single source to motivate the investigation with the use of a single source in the story. Yes, Deepthroat was the single original source for Woodward and Bernstein, but they did a lot of leg work to corroborate what they were told before anything went to press. The same cannot be…

Why are you such a cunt?

AMAZING!