surlybastard
surlybastard
surlybastard

The problem is not Jackie, it's the complete lack of fact checking on the part of the RS writer. If there were discrepancies that couldn't be accounted for, but the author still believed that, underneath, there had been some kind of sexual assault, perhaps the writer shouldn't have made specific claims about the

You keep conflating the use of a single source to motivate the investigation with the use of a single source in the story. Yes, Deepthroat was the single original source for Woodward and Bernstein, but they did a lot of leg work to corroborate what they were told before anything went to press. The same cannot be

Why are you such a cunt?

AMAZING!

This is really just another reason tha weddings are dumb. Get married at a courthouse and have w reception at chilis.

Is there a Jack the Ripper minifig?

Once it gets below freezing, pour cold water out the window on the tourists. That'll get rid of them fast.

When are you people going to stop acting like "gamers" are a protected class?

I don't understand EGR's balancing here either. Hale's behavior certainly meets the legal definition of stalking. So what if the reviewer said mean things about her book.

I'm pretty sure that if the reviewer had gone to the police, law enforcement would have considered this stalking, not an "investigation." So there's your answer.

I'm disappointed that porn Linda wasn't played by a man, to be consistent with the cartoon's casting.

So, all other things being equal: Short guy with an average penis or average height guy with a micro penis?

Thanks for the captions. I usually have no idea who the fuck any of these folks are supposed to be.

Hippie!

Do you really see yourself as part of some oppressed group?

So what are all you 'gaters going to say when one of your lower functioning neckbeard brethren, inspired by this crap, physically assaults someone?

Are you really going to compare yourself to a civil rights protestor?

Sorry, guess we're just going to disagree, but you are putting a major premium on journalistic ethics for a topic which just isn't that important. In the most recent example of bad behavior in mainstream journalism, Lara Logan's BS Benghazi interview, the response was no where near as hostile and vitriolic as what I

An overall reasonable response. But here's the thing: "journalistic ethics." A huge amount of journalism, no matter the subject matter, is built on personal connections: who you went to school with, what bars and restaurants you frequent, who you're related to, and yes, who you date. Yes, this can certainly lead

What the hell is it about then? Are the games you like still getting made? Are you still able to buy those games? Can you point to any instance where you were misled by a gaming site into buying a shitty game? Can you prove that the gaming site was "bought off" in some way to deliberately mislead you?