I will never understand this point of view. Just because the power is there does not mean you have to be full throttle all the time to enjoy the car. Its nice to have the power when you can use it but it is not a necessity to use a car at 100% capacity on any public road. Hell driving a 1.7 liter 237 hp 4C at 100%…

Very nice Lamborghini! Well done!

No longer interested. Keep your stupid naming scheme copying also.

Actually they are from previous statements. This is going to be smaller than the S-Class and 7 Series and they said it would have better driving dynamics....if that does not say halo performance car I don't know what does.

Well if going by the 1/4 mile time make it the best performance bargain around then I think the Hellcat might want a word with you. It runs the 1/4 at the same speed and costs less.

Yeah I think Chevy took their partnership with Transformers a bit too far!

I would much rather be covered for 5 years under an OEM than 3 years under a tuner with a spotty history. When you buy a car does warranty not matter to you? Or does it only matter to people who can't afford a car? I know when I spent $40,000 on a brand new truck the warranty mattered, if a tuner offered a truck…

My point is Hennessy's warranty is worse than the Hellcats. Just because a tuner offers a warranty does not automatically mean it is good.

Wow, can no one in the auto industry be original anymore?

If any Bugatti Veyron owners are reading this could I have one of your 84 cars, preferably a Maserati GranTurismo....you know if you have a spare one laying around.

So basically you are paying the same money as a Hellcat for a Mustang with a shittier warranty? I'm not hating on the new Mustang I think it is great, but I personally would wait for the GT350 instead of this "tuned" car with a shitty warranty.

Not a chance Ford will cover HPE work. HPE only offers a 3 year or 36,000 mile warranty where as the Hellcat offers a 5 year or 100,000 warranty.

Only for 3 years or 36,000, the hellcat is a 5 year 100,000 mile warranty.

I am not a fan of this at all. If I want a Aston Martin sedan with a 550 hp V12 that actually looks sexy I will get a Rapide S.

Torch you clearly don't know this industry very well. Companies most defiantly do design some cars to appeal towards men or women. If you want annalists to get over it maybe you should tell automotive companies to get over it. Sorry but you are calling out the wrong person here.

You don't think lawyers are pr people? lol fucking idiot. When a lawyer tells you what to say to cover your ass, what do you think he is doing?

I can't wait for all the youtube videos like this of all the mid life crisis balding men spinning out their z06.

But if it is a smaller, better-handling car then they are going to be going against the M5, E63 AMG, ect... which is arguably an even tougher class. Its an enthusiast class and if the CT6 is off in the driving dynamics/power/luxury then it is a tough sell. Where as the S-Class segment is more about technology and…

Already making excuses...that is not a good sign. So lets break this down, it is not going to go against the 7-series or S-Class, it is going to be smaller and have "better" driving dynamics. So this is going to be an M5, E63 AMG, Panamera S, ect fighter? Good luck.

The SRT Dart made the list but the FT-1 didn't? Wow.