That's why they have multiple targeting systems.

That would be against US policy. Executive order 12333 states that the US government can't assassinate people. And I think that is probably a good thing. Unilateral operations tend not to work for us, and until the UN authorizes countries to act militarily to remove Qaddafi, we should restrict our military actions to…

What's more altruistic than stopping a murderous tyrant and saving civilians?

Yes, but having to scrap a plant is quite different than Armageddon, which I believe was tossed around by a couple of sources, including this blog.

The original article didn't specify British, it just said that the British manufactured similar shells, along with the French and Indians.

So his five seconds that turned up information from experts is inferior to your ability to make claims without any support at all? Argument: You're doing it wrong.

Then why did you promote?

SC Resolution 1973 authorized actions to prevent violence against civilians. These planes could be used to destroy armored units that are attacking civilian areas, which would be completely within the scope of Resolution 1973.

If you can't see it, it can't see you.

Estimates that include Japanese lives run at more like 10 million.

I believe that it is destroyer of worlds.

A protest would be refusing to read the NYTimes. I'm not a lawyer, but I would guess if you access digital resources that you don't own without permission, it is stealing.

$195 includes smartphone access, and if you are linked to the article., it doesn't count against the 20 article limit. I'm not arguing that the prices are reasonable, because that is all a personal decision, what I am saying is that if you disagree with the prices you should do what you would do with a physical good…

Hey, they're just trying to follow the Switzerland approach—"stay away or we will fuck you up."

It's only $195 if you don't need an iPad subscription. And it is entirely reasonable for them to impose a paywall. You don't complain about them charging for their newspapers, and you would consider it wrong to steal from a newsstand, but you find it ok to effectively steal from them online?

It's also about comparing a scenario to the Nazis.

Hey, no ground troops will be committed, and America's role is set to diminish, so I'm pretty optimistic.

Actually, in Arabic, it's معمر القذافي‎. Arabic uses the Arabic alphabet, which has different sounds than the English alphabet, and so the confusion comes from trying to convert the sounds from one alphabet to the other.

This is a relatively cheap operation, as military interventions go.

The U.S. does get involved quite often, but it's such a fine line to walk. What I would prefer is to have a stronger UN Security Council that has the ability to intervene far more often, so that instead of the US, the UK, Canada, and Australia intervening without international support, we have a system that can…