Normally I’d agree with you, but considering goddamn cunts like Piers Morgan were criticizing her for not showing up soon enough I can’t fault her for it in this case.
superdoe
superdoe
It just sounds like she was raised around eccentric people and that she’s a little eccentric herself (isn’t half of Hollywood?), still love the Rebz. And if her mom called her Rebel and everyone knew her as Rebel... who really cares what’s on her birth certificate?
I just watched Sarah’s new special. I liked it a lot. Especially in comparison to Schumer and CK’s disappointments recently.
CUPCAKES ARE OVERRATED! There I said it!
All I want is for people in charge of casting movies or TV to pick literally anyone else. There are millions of actors who aren’t Johnny Depp, you can’t tell me they can’t do the job just as well or better.
“Mathers said she meant to send the photo to a friend and had no intentions of “breaking the law” by posting it publicly.”
I am SO. MAD. that Depp is in this. I love every other person in the cast but I can’t go see it because I don’t want Depp to get a cent of my money.
I also shuddered at the presence of Depp, but it seems like maybe he’s the one getting murdered so I’m slightly more on board. Of course I’m only on board if there aren’t a lot of flashbacks featuring an alive Depp long after he is killed off. That’s not cool.
This should be right in my wheelhouse, but I don’t think I will be able to get past A. That Mustache, B. the presence of Johnny Depp, or C. the soundtrack, if it’s anything like what was in the trailer. I mean, just one of these things might be overlookable (I have my doubts I will ever be able to look past that…
Number one red flag for literally anybody I ever meet that I know immediately is a horrendous person to deal with, they make a super obvious mistake and then double down hard as FUCK on it, inventing an entire universe in which their mistake wasn’t a mistake just to avoid admitting to a pretty innocuous mistake.
Good Lord, they have both aged beautifully.
The child cannot advocate for himself, so the court is acting as his advocate. He can’t be saved; he can only live in pain for a little while longer while being essentially an experiment. It’s an awful position to be in all around, whether you’re the parents, the court, or the poor little boy that should probably be…
The poor baby has serious, serious brain damage... He can’t breathe on his own, he can’t eat, I remember reading in another news article that he can’t move or control his muscles. He’s dead. There’s nothing his parents can do to help him and keeping him “alive” is just cruel.
I’m comparing two situations in which people who are terminally ill and who, if they are kept alive through experimental procedures, will have zero quality of life are kept alive by their selfish if grief-stricken caregivers because they can’t bear to face the pain of saying goodbye.
The hospital is charged with acting in the best interest of the patient, not in simply doing what the parents tell them to do. They’re probably counter-claiming that the parents aren’t making decisions in the child’s best interest to keep them from prolonging his suffering.
Have you tried viewing pornography instead?
I imagine because the hospital’s lawyers are arguing that they’re not acting in the best interest of the patient, so they are counter-claiming that the parents aren’t objective enough to make a decision against medical advice.
His brain is damaged. You don’t come back from that. This experimental treatment will only prolong is life and allow for more brain damage. Doesn’t the child’s suffering matter to you at all?
I have a chronic illness that is nowhere near as debilitating as this poor child. No. Let him go. You do not have the right to make another human being live in excruciating pain because you can’t let go. I understand their position, I really do - I have a child and would be absolutely devastated if we had to heal…