@Anarian: Well, they're not creating these ad-hoc networks, but they are seeing the ones already broadcasting.
@Anarian: Well, they're not creating these ad-hoc networks, but they are seeing the ones already broadcasting.
@aNak: aNak is a noob at social discourse.
@Live N Learn: Fine by me, but I suspect there are a lot more cheapskates around than you think, who'll be willing to wait for the 3.0 prices to drop.
@goaliefight: So LH likes Dropbox. What's the big deal?
@Live N Learn: 16gb usb drives can be had for about $30 now. I can live with the slower speeds and save the $60 and be happy enough.
At these prices, I'm fine with 2.0.
One looked like an apple and the other like an orange?
@GBH2: Droids are so 1977.
@adinnieken: Ah, furniture retailers. There's one near me that had a funny "sale" recently. Buy however much furniture you want at the floor places, and then get the equivalently priced furniture for free. So if you spend $1000, you can choose another $1000 worth of furniture free. Naturally, all the furniture was…
@fadecomic: But their very presence can be annoying. Inline links are a bit distracting.
@samyoed: I have the latest Touch. I was excited about the folders, but it hasn't been worth it. My Touch crashes a lot, and is pretty sluggish since the ios4 upgrade. Really disappointed because it ran like a charm before.
I wouldn't mind a Touch update, because ios4 sure runs like shite on it.
@franssjansen: If you read the comments, you'd see that the other half of Gizmodo's readers think Giz is _anti_ Apple.
@LadyPerseverance: You speak the truth.
Half.com
But it's magical.
Can't say I'm all that surprised; he's always had a certain kind of self-righteousness about him that always leads to trouble.
@tailstoo: Giz has always seemed pretty pro Apple to me, maybe to a fault, despite the recent legal stuff. In fact, I thought you meant Giz was too biased in favor of Apple.
@tailstoo: I hear you, but the let's face it, the iPad and new iPhone are among the biggest gadget launches this year.
@Joey Hall: Sigh. There's always one idiot who posts this from his easy chair after scratching his ass. You obviously have no real conception of Darwinism. The world needs risk takers to advance. That some of them die doesn't mean they're stupid or that the gene pool is improved.