That was my thought. She makes her money as a GOP strategist. She can’t just say that she’s voting for Hillary no matter what. But she can say she’s conflicted if it’s very close. It gives her just enough wiggle room to vote her conscience (Clinton) without outright lying to the people who eventually may employ her.

Exactly! Look at this table!

That’s for fucking sure. Could there be anyone more clueless than a Stein voter? They’re so enamored with their own delicate selves they have absolutely no space to consider anyone else. I mean, seriously? The fact they can say “Trump and Clinton are exactly alike!” shows they have given precisely zero thought to the…

Exactly. Her party created Trump, whether she wants to admit it or not. Pence is no prize, he’s just better behaved in public.

I don’t understand the attachment people have to political parties. Parties change. Platforms change. People change. There’s no reason you have to be unconditionally loyal to it if it sucks. It’s not a sports team. It’s just a fucking label.

You’re implying I didn’t read it.

I’ll be honest, I struggle to feel compassion for Christine Chubbuck and other people who commit suicide in public. I can’t imagine what it must have been like for her co-workers to be in the studio that day and watch her shoot herself right before their eyes. It is the same when people throw themselves in front of a…

This is kind of fab, although I want to light those shoes on fire. Diana would never.

I am a scientist and I have personally experienced severe mood side effects from certain hormonal contraceptives. With that position stated upfront, I was pleased that this study had the impact that it did. It’s unfortunate (but not surprising) that many headlines/readers ran straight for the implication of a) a huge…

Apparently she said it in a ‘intimidating’ tone and shook her hand ‘forcefully’. You know. Because having a strong handshake and confident voice are inherently threatening if you don’t have a penis.

I am, I suppose, from a younger generation, and as of yesterday, I still wasn’t totally familiar with what exactly happened with Juanita Broaddrick. Finally, last night, I started googling, reading articles from reputable sites as well as court documents, going way back to the nineties.

According to the totally sane people on FB, it’s because she stayed with him for political gain and was complicit and, therefore, doesn’t deserve our respect.

they believe in law and order as cops arrest the guy, guy has to be guilty, so he must go to prison. any lawyer who does well is “crooked,” and oh yeah they’re all liars as well.

She didn’t fucking laugh about it. You’re a shameless liar.

Do you have any idea how you are not stating the facts because you have been listening to the anti-Clinton spin? Check the actual record: Clinton never said that. It was said by other people that testified for the defense including a child psychologist who testified that the complainant was “emotionally unstable…

And she didn’t even really get him off. Though it was quite clear he assaulted the girl, there was very little evidence that would have stood up to trial but she arranged for him to plead to a lesser charge so he did serve at least SOME time and had a charge on his record.

She didn’t get him off. It was a plea deal — like 97% of cases — and he pled guilty.

Hillary didn’t get the client off; she got him to plead guilty (yes, a lesser defense, but that’s generally the benefit given for avoiding the cost and risk of a trial): http://www.factcheck.org/2016/06/clintons-1975-rape-case/

How could Clinton have mishandled the rape case when she was a public defendant?