sudden_eyes
sudden_eyes
sudden_eyes

Yes, it would indeed be correct. John meets Sherlock in January 2010, so the next year is 2011 - during which some of the events in "A Scandal in Bohemia," and all of the events in "The Hounds of Baskerville" and "The Reichenbach Fall," occur - that's made clear at the v. beginning of "Reichenbach," by the person

Here's a link to the Neil Gaiman story I mentioned in my previous comment: A Study in Emerald (it's in PDF).

Question for Ms. Vertue: Is anyone at BBC going to straighten out the dates in John Watson's blog? Surely it should be "Just a quick update before we go into 2011," rather than 2012? V. confusing.

If you want to read every damn theory that's out there, I must refer you to what may be the most obsessive fan tumblr to ever exist: The Final Problem. Have fun! (Warning - I spent an amazing amount of time there when I was supposed to be working.)

Jeff the not-Mormon-fighting cabbie - true, I hadn't even thought of that. I was kind of hoping for Christina Hendricks for Irene Adler, but Ms. Pulver is fantastic.

May we hope for photos? I did send in my little hopeful entry email, but alas ...

A question for Benedict Cumberbatch: you've become well known (to put it mildly) because of "Sherlock" and the fact that you're performing in both "The Hobbit" and the next "Star Trek" movie. But you've long been highly respected because of your work in what I suppose must be called "straight drama." Do you want /

There are a couple of "definitive" Guardian stories about this one - but I continue to find it an excellent question, because what the creators have said and what we're seeing on screen are ... different.

SPOILER!

For Stephen Moffat and Sue Vertue: Obviously we're all really excited for Series 2, and THANK YOU for all the hard work and scheduling madness that allowed it to get filmed. And we understand that everyone's schedules mandate a delay in the filming of Series 3. So my question isn't when - it's WHAT. Which stories

These are excellent questions!

May I try? Sherlock Holmes was v. science-forward from the get-go, with the tobacco ash et al. Many of the written and screen adaptations and mash-ups have had at least a futuristic element, and in some cases sci-fi (Google "A Study in Emerald"). The BBC Sherlock, with the flashes of text that get us into his

I love the "A" restaurant rating sign on the left, which totally places this in NYC right now. Also, this looks a little like the Edison Hotel Coffee Shop, off Times Square. But probably it's just a set.

As lordkyellen notes a couple of comments up, one can argue that Terminator and Terminator 2 are different genres. I'd say they're certainly "almost" different genres.

Sherlock, y'all! Season 2 is amazing.

Hmm.

My issue was all her scenes with Stellan Skarsgard. They spent the entire movie talking past each other; there was just no connection.

Re: Hiddleston - I agree, that would be really interesting.

Missing: the family in F. Scott Fitzgerald's "A Diamond as Big as the Ritz."

*Joins you in misery-fest*