As long as they say they're speculating we can't tell if they're actually revealing things. So what does it matter? It's the ones who say they've read the book but what they're going to say isn't a spoiler who you have to be careful with.

Maybe this is because the format of this show is so reminiscent of Damages but that, and the almost-horror-level filming techniques (jump scare angles, etc), make me a lot less trusting of Celeste's and Jane's narratives than most of the commenters here seem to be. With the other couples, there are moments where the…

But as long as we don't know, it really doesn't matter.

Haven't read the book, so not a spoiler but — we don't seem to have been shown Celeste's dark side yet, which is making me suspect there's a twist to her character that will make us judge that marriage differently when it's revealed.

I think that if the twins did it, there's more to it than just copying what they see at home. It's downright sinister that they keep asking to have Ziggy over to spend the night — IF they did it. (I haven't read the book).

That's because the better actor disappears into the character. The fact that Katie Holmes and Joshua Jackson stuck out meant that they weren't playing their roles as well as Michelle Williams was playing hers.

I've been surprised to read so many comments under the posts on this show expressing … well … surprise that Olyphant can do comedy. His comic timing on Justified was always impeccable, and he's been one of the most genuinely hilarious guests on the talk show circuit for years.

People do this with "juxtapose" too.

Once one person starts spoiling, the whole conversation devolves into a discussion about later episodes. Which is boring. This is a post about this episode.

Milo left a 50% tip for that Buffalo Wings employee, actually.

I was responding to someone saying he had a Scottish accent. It was you who corrected me. Wrongly.

No — so I'm not sure why you corrected me in the first place.

Nesbitt himself describes his accent as Northern Irish, because that's what it is.

The kids the books and show are ostensibly aimed at are supposed to identify with Klaus and Violet, not be entertained by them. If these actors were "twinkling" in these roles I would be annoyed.

They are basically self-fulfilling prophecies, presented in an appropriately absurd way. Josephine, repressing her grief with dogmatic attention to grammar rules, is a great portrait of negative anxiety.

Violet's politeness can come across as smarmy, especially when she's translating Sunny to other people. But she's ok. And I think Klaus is good.

Oh, I'm really impressed with the series so far (halfway through The Wide Window). I was just talking about it being crucial to the books.

I don't think it matters what they were going to do. Their presence robs the audience of that sense that the Baudelaires are totally on their own, which I think is pretty crucial to the first installments of the story.

The Gilmore girls have all the clothes, food, and entertainment they want unless the plot demands it, and then suddenly they're dirt poor.

Paris's crying in this episode was amazing. Her face was maybe the most realistic-looking "sob face" I've ever seen on tv.