I don't doubt that Martha could have heard this type of music at the time. I just don't think she would have chosen to listen to it while eating her depressing potato dinner.

You don't really believe that defendants accept lesser sentence plea deals because they are actually "sorry," do you?

Everything you said about the punch seems like stuff that should be covered in the trial. Also, in the case you were involved with, the girl seems more like a witness than a "victim." I still don't see how a victim impact statement is necessary. Those "statements" appear just be an opportunity for people to berate the…

I understand that there's a certain type of music associated with Soviet-era Russia, but, seriously—would Martha (American as apple pie) really be listening to it at home in her leisure time?

If that's the case, he was taking one hell of a gamble by allowing Liv to eat some of it.

Wait, what? Judges don't understand how "serious" a crime is until someone tells the court how upset they've been since it occurred?

Correction—"climate change."

My theory is that the blue dye from Ravi's lab will be the missing ingredient that brings back their memories (since it triggers such strong and sharp visions in zombies).

Is it the case that hearing a lineup of people speak about their devastation should move the judge and result in a harsher sentence for the offender?

Here's what i think will happen: Aida and Fitz go back to the framework. Tripp, Ward, Mack and (by extension) Hope are still fugitive terrorists in the framework, so they are still being hunted down.

Say what you will about this season (and previous seasons) of American Crime…too many storylines, too bleak, too disjointed—whatever. None of the show's supposed faults matter when the writing, acting and ambition are as strong as this.

I may be wrong but you may be right.

The very beginning, where they CGI'd a night sky into the background.

I'm guessing the sci-fi books will, in some way, tie in to the UFOs from last season at some point.

Oh, come on…the Trump pussy-grabber reference was subtle and awesome…a lot more subtle than the "alternative facts" reference. And funnier, too.

The thing is, though, that Chuck has convinced himself (and, apparently, you) that his beef with Jimmy is due to Jimmy's casual relationship with the letter of the law and the damage that Jimmy could inflict on the legal system and the reputation of Chuck's firm.

Except that Ryan Murphy has too much power in Hollywood now, so I don't think he would have any hesitation about changing another writer's original work to fit whatever insipid twist or sudden character switch that Murphy suddenly feels like throwing in for absolutely no reason.

While the episode was good overall, man, was that CGI at the beginning just atrocious! It was so bad that I began to think that maybe it was bad on purpose (like the "sitcom" video they used on an episode of Mr. Robot), and that they would suddenly reveal the reason why it looked so terrible right before they rolled…

Me too…and I'm surprised that the reviewer fell for her innocent/helpful act. Anytime your employer wants to take away the documentation you would need in order to leave, it's pretty clear that the employer's intentions are not charitable.

The way Felicity Huffman handles the smallest details of her character, down to the very slight smile that crosses Jeanette's face anytime she has to face something uncomfortable or humiliating, as though she has been conditioned as a woman with no power to use a smile to disarm people in difficult situations.