I disagree. She’s a spin master. No matter what you throw at the woman, she pivots back to her nonsense talking points, that’s precisely what she was hired to do, and she did a good job of it.

My god will the hunt for people to blame never cease? What is with you? How many enemies do you need? Why, at the end of the election, are liberals so set on finding out-group enemies rather than looking in at ANYTHING they do or say?

And yet Trump will be our next president. It’s almost like the US presidential elections aren’t as simple as the time you won the hall monitor position in fifth grade.

She failed in getting 270 electoral votes, which is how the presidency is won. The path to 270 is the goal, not the popular vote.

Put this prick on the “no fly” list. He’s the last guy I want on my plane.

You don’t kick babies off flights because they can’t help it. They are absolutely right to kick belligerent and obnoxious passengers off a flight.

Amy Schumer has loads of problematic stuff about her but her worst sin is being painfully unfunny.

Uh, not a Trump voter, and I think you mean “their.”

I’m neither okay with it nor do I condone it. I am just saying that influencing and rigging are not factually the same. I don’t want Trump, but pretending that the election was rigged when it wasn’t doesn’t help anybody. It was influenced, not rigged and that is substantially bad.

I’m not buying this. We literally told all the trump idiot that’s there is no possible way for the elections to be rigged when trump was complaining about mass voter fraud. He won because he won the right states. Now did the Russians hack the DNC ? Possibly

“We are talking about Russia literally rigging our elections.”

“We are talking about Russia literally rigging our elections.”

Counterpoint: Stop adding the “Man-” prefix to everything you don’t like. You’re doing nothing but making a gender issue out of something that has nothing to do with gender. Your examples of “Manthreading” (ugh) aren’t even directed at or about women. They’re just people breaking up their lengthier thoughts on…

Agreed that doing the whole “threading” thing is obnoxious. Where this goes off the rails (instantly) is making it the whole “mostly men” thing. That’s not my experience personally, there’s no substantiation whatsoever and it’s just gender-baiting for clicks.

This is the author’s twitter page. No joke.

“Today, a woman named Alana Hope Levinson, a “journalist” with around 30 readers, decided it was time for her to voice her concern that people are “ruining her experiences” without consultation from the rest of the internet (it wasn’t time and will never be time)“

FTFY

Sorry Alana, but you don’t have any more of a right…

What is this garbage?

Another, “men shut up,” post.

By “undocumented” do you mean illegal? Allowing anyone in is a slap in the face to everyone else who followed the law and spent time and money on the immigration process.

Why? Have they made other comments in other articles that I’m not aware of that made you suspect trolling or is it just the fact that he agrees with a burqa ban?